Misdirections

mirddes wrote:

James, i bounced an idea around and was thoroughly pleased with the responses given. how is this lying?

Bouncing around an idea would suggest you actually engaged with people. At every turn, you refused to explain why your change was positive, and you have entirely failed to point out that people repeatedly explained in detail why your suggested change is overwhelmingly negative.

You are entirely misrepresenting the discussion that was had with your coquetteish faux naivety.

If you would prefer, I can point out that your intentional disingenuous misrepresentation of everything that has happened. In simple terms, it's lying.

direwolf wrote:

I am not privy to any previous conversation on this topic. Viewing only what I see here, the original poster was polite, and your response was not warranted.

Perhaps, next time, you should wait until you do understand the background before being being rude, then.

Like direwolf, I don't have any idea of the previous conversation, but - outside rampant hostility between James and mirrdes in which James is far from being the impolite one - I would like to reiterate what is important about new-ish card :

* how would they help existing weak archetype ?
* would it create a more enjoyable VtES experience ?
* what would be the vtes flavor for them ?

All thoses questions are left untouched, I suppose because mirrdes know they would shoot his "idea" in the sky. Or at least, it's what a quick reflexion say may, and the original post does not incite me to put a lot of thought in that.

i don't know how to answer these questions.

i only know that it was satisfying being ousted by a player using misdirections.

the only positive i can identify with my suggested "tap x minions for 2x-1 where x does not exceed number of methuselah" is that it balances between old and new card text.

untap cards ftw, right?

how would a ani weenie deck with a library of just armies of rats, blood dolls and vessels be stopped? (20 of each)

not every situation has an answer and its really satisfying to be beaten by a well thought out concept.

just tapping minions isnt enough.

perception, deception, reality.

peace.

have a great night.

mirddes wrote:

how would a ani weenie deck with a library of just armies of rats, blood dolls and vessels be stopped? (20 of each)

Just for your information: multiple Army of Rats are not cumulative. Your prey burns 1 pool regardless how many copies you control.

mirddes wrote:

not every situation has an answer and its really satisfying to be beaten by a well thought out concept.

just tapping minions isnt enough.

Well, I will be honest : you really should try to improve your english. There is foreigner here like me, and part of your apparent rudeness is simply due to the fact that what you say is often barely understandable by me.

I perfectly understand that nobody is perfect, that it is a bit hypocritical coming from me, and that my english is not exactly that good, but I just don't understand what you are trying to say.