file Submission: Mark Sandhurst

16 Aug 2017 13:57 #83124 by jamesatzephyr

adding those put him in league with current snake punch minions, giving him a reasonable outlet for his d action and untap. There can be no "typhonic beast decks have too much support" complaints, because they aren't exactly winning every tournament, or any really.
Also, those just work better on setites anyway....


I am very much in favour of a few more warrior Setites in a cluster. My main complaint with most of them is that in isolation they're not bad, but it's hard to craft a deck around them as they're a bit sparsely distributed - so you don't have a nice range of vampires to pick from, to support you etc - the midbie with POT SER for obf, the 4 cap with pot/pre/ser etc.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 Aug 2017 01:21 - 17 Aug 2017 01:24 #83128 by jblacey
Replied by jblacey on topic Submission: Mark Sandhurst
Here is a new version based on feedback and testing:

Mark Sandhurst
8 Capacity Group 5 :fose:
:AUS: :PRE: :SER: :for: :obf: :pot:
Camarilla. Once during your minion phase, Mark may unlock after a successful non-bleed (D) action.

Here is the Math:
8 Cap = +9
6 diff disciplines = +1
9 disc = -9
ability = -1
=0

If people are interested... this is one of my playtest decks:

My Combat Rush / Intercept deck (rough design)

Crypt (12 cards, min=3, max=10, avg= 7.92)

4 Ghede
3 Mark Sandhurst
2 Seterpenre
1 Veejay Vinod
1 Pearl
1 Tyler McGill

Library (90 cards)

Action (10)
3 Ambush
3 Bum's Rush
2 Nose of the Hound
2 Temptation

Action Modifier (9)
2 Enkil Cog
7 Freak Drive

Ally (1)
1 Saatet-ta (Bane Mummy)

Combat (32)
6 Immortal Grapple
5 Taste of Vitae
5 Trap
2 Telepathic Tracking
12 Typhonic Beast
2 Slam

Equipment (1)
1 Hand of Conrad

Event (1)
1 Dragonbound

Master (20)
4 Villein
3 Dreams of the Sphinx
2 Vessel
2 Fortitude
2 Potence
1 Fame
1 Giant's Blood
1 Pentex(TM) Subversion
1 Rack, The
1 Powerbase: Montreal
1 Temple Hunting Ground
1 Heidelberg Castle, Germany

Reaction (16)
4 Eyes of Argus
4 My Enemy's Enemy
4 On the Qui Vive
4 Telepathic Misdirection
Last edit: 17 Aug 2017 01:24 by jblacey.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 Aug 2017 20:40 #83150 by Hakuron
Replied by Hakuron on topic Submission: Mark Sandhurst
Sorry for entering this discussion rather late:
I am not if I want to see yet another Fortitude FoS in group 4/5, even though he cannot be the target of Eternals of Sirius.

What are your thoughts about other groups?

National Coordinator Germany
nc [dot] germany [at] magenta [dot] de

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 Aug 2017 21:44 #83151 by jblacey
Replied by jblacey on topic Submission: Mark Sandhurst
Group 6 wouldn't be horrible, as most of the vampires you would want to run him with are in Group 5. That said, fortitude isn't critical, if that is the sticking point we could replace it with something else.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
22 Aug 2017 16:55 #83181 by jblacey
Replied by jblacey on topic Submission: Mark Sandhurst
After some thought, it might be best to drop :for: for :nec:

Mark Sandhurst
8 Capacity Group 5 :fose:
:AUS: :PRE: :SER: :nec: :obf: :pot:
Camarilla. Once each turn, Mark may unlock at the end of a successful non-bleed (D) action.

Reasons
1) This adds several potential non-bleed (D) necromancy actions.
2) This adds a good cross over in group 4-5 with Cagliostro, Abdelsobek, Neferu and Seterpenre.
3) In group 5-6, in addition he can cross over with Count Jocalo, who really needs the extra support.
4) This addresses the concern that :for: is too abundant in groups 4-5.
5) His base text makes :for: unnecessary.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Moderators: AnkhaKraus
Time to create page: 0.065 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum