file Call the Great Beast

22 Feb 2018 22:00 #85396 by self biased
Replied by self biased on topic Call the Great Beast
Spelling out "three" is clearer in a lot of ways, especially since we see numerals later in the text.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
22 Feb 2018 22:29 #85398 by TwoRazorReign
Replied by TwoRazorReign on topic Call the Great Beast
I see zero benefit to spelling "three" out. In what way does it affect clarity? I wonder what the thought process was to spell it out.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
22 Feb 2018 22:29 #85399 by Blooded Sand
Replied by Blooded Sand on topic Call the Great Beast

I think someone during the playtest managed to hit for 13 aggro unpreventable under IG. The set to 4 stopped that as TS was a key part

Sure. With a set strength, it would have only been 10 aggravated, that makes all the difference.


Indeed it does, as it means your IC is in torpor, and not outright burnt from a single strike...

:assa: :flight: :QUI: :OBF: :POT: :FOR: :TEM: :DOM:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 Feb 2018 08:41 #85407 by Ankha
Replied by Ankha on topic Call the Great Beast

I think someone during the playtest managed to hit for 13 aggro unpreventable under IG. The set to 4 stopped that as TS was a key part

Sure. With a set strength, it would have only been 10 aggravated, that makes all the difference.


Indeed it does, as it means your IC is in torpor, and not outright burnt from a single strike...

Torn Signpost basically gives +2 strength. You can replace it with a Fist of Death, or an increased Strength. So the whole argument is moot.

Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Moderators: AnkhaKraus
Time to create page: 0.079 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum