file Ellison Humboldt and Matteus, flesh sculptor

07 Mar 2018 09:08 - 07 Mar 2018 09:09 #85597 by Bloodartist
Simply put: Can Ellison Humboldt s ability be used multiple times during same referendum, for multiple different princes?

My gut instinct is no, due to the wording ("..may burn A blood to.."), however the card text doesn't explicitly deny it. The ability also seems really strong if multi-use is possible..

What about Matteus, flesh sculptor 's similar ability with a slightly different wording? (Can it be used to get multiple intercept against an archbishops political action). In this case I would imagine that it can (and I've already used it so once)

A heretic is a man who sees with his own eyes.
—Gotthold Ephraim Lessing



Last edit: 07 Mar 2018 09:09 by Bloodartist.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Mar 2018 09:13 #85598 by Ankha

Simply put: Can Ellison Humboldt s ability be used multiple times during same referendum, for multiple different princes?

My gut instinct is no, due to the wording ("..may burn A blood to.."), however the card text doesn't explicitly deny it. The ability also seems really strong if multi-use is possible..


Name: Ellison Humboldt
[CE:V/PN, BSC:X]
Cardtype: Vampire
Clan: Nosferatu
Group: 3
Capacity: 9
Discipline: pro ANI OBF POT PRE
Camarilla primogen: Princes cannot block Ellison. During a referendum, Ellison may burn a blood to force a ready prince to cast votes and ballots as Ellison's controller wishes. This can change the prince's votes and ballots.


Relevant card text is: "during a referendum". It can be used only once per referendum.


[quote="Bloodartist" post=85597What about Matteus, flesh sculptor 's similar ability with a slightly different wording? (Can it be used to get multiple intercept against an archbishops political action). In this case I would imagine that it can (and I've already used it so once)[/quote]

Name: Matteus, Flesh Sculptor
[Sabbat:V, BH:PTo]
Cardtype: Vampire
Clan: Toreador antitribu
Group: 2
Capacity: 10
Discipline: AUS CEL PRE VIC
Sabbat priscus: Matteus may burn 1 additional blood to play an action card that requires an archbishop or cardinal. He may burn 1 blood to get +1 intercept against an archbishop, cardinal or regent attempting a political action.


Matteus can use both abilities more than once per action (like Maris Streck).

Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
The following user(s) said Thank You: SaRod

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Mar 2018 09:45 #85599 by Bloodartist
After a bit of searching, I can now see where this ruling comes from;

Terminology:
"During time period X, (you may) do Y" limits Y to once per phase X. [LSJ 19970625]

I'm fine with the ruling itself. However I think the wording on this card (and similar) is more than a bit vague. If we reprint these cards, I would like to see the wording be made more clear.
In my opinion if multi-use is not supposed to be possible, it should be stated so explicitly.

A heretic is a man who sees with his own eyes.
—Gotthold Ephraim Lessing



Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Mar 2018 13:06 - 07 Mar 2018 13:32 #85602 by Ankha

After a bit of searching, I can now see where this ruling comes from;

Terminology:
"During time period X, (you may) do Y" limits Y to once per phase X. [LSJ 19970625]


It's also (and more importantly) in the rulebook:

Wording templates
“During X, do Y”: The “during X do Y” template is used in several cards. When this template is used, only one Y can be done per X with this card. For instance, you may move blood from your vampire to your pool with Vessel only once per unlock phase.

I'm fine with the ruling itself. However I think the wording on this card (and similar) is more than a bit vague. If we reprint these cards, I would like to see the wording be made more clear.
In my opinion if multi-use is not supposed to be possible, it should be stated so explicitly.


There's a very interesting discussion about it here:

groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/wZIqD6ZA9ms/ZZBajlRC6T0J

LSJ considered the change, but it was unsatisfactory. Chosen quotes:

> Sure, space is at a premium on most cards, but "once each"
> in place of "during X phase" would be a very minimal increase
> (if any) in text used and would produce unambiguous clarity
> for a lot of readers that aren't finding that clarity in the
> "during X do Y" phrasing.
OK. I'll adopt the "once each" phrasing whenever possible.

Unambiguous clarity is a nice goal. Given the Skin of Rock
examples, however, I'm not sure it is attainable. :-)

Hmm. I was just going through the card list making the substitutions,
and it is generally pretty awkward and stilted (unless the change
actually alters the meaning) after the change. Seems like I had gone
down that route before and reached the same end then as well.

> It seems to work reasonably well for me, if I replace "During your
> X phase" with "Once each of your X phases". At least, this reads
> OK for me on Hunting Grounds.
"Once each of" has the unfortunate property that it can easily be
misread as "When it becomes true that each of", so that reading
needs to be eliminated as early in the sentence as possible.

As in "Once during each of" or "Once in" or "During".
"Once in" begins to look like "At the start of", so that's not
a clean "fix".

> For vampire abilities written "if Foo is ready during your X
> phase," I like "if Foo is ready, once each of your X phases,".
"Once during each of your X phases, if Foo is ready, ..." is
clearer.

> Still, you're right that it takes some effort to go through and
> determine which cards that use "during" would need altering and
> what the best way to include "once" would be. I'd be happy
> enough if future cards were simply written to use a "once"
> phrasing instead of relying on the "during X do Y means once"
> rule. :-)
It seems to be clearly better for instances when it really is "each"
and not just "each of your". "Once each minion phase, ...". But
those cases are few.


and

Kerravon wrote:
> Why not simply change the text so that anyone can instantly know how it
> works
> ie
>
> "Once during any Methuselah's minion phase, you may burn the Edge to untap
> Torvus."
>
> "Once during your untap phase, you may move 1 blood from the blood bank to a
> ready vampire you control."
>
> It needs to be changed. As there are alot of players who have the exact same
> problem I do in interpreting these cards.
> Or in other words I shouldn't need to go online to ask this question.
With those wordings, some players will ask if the ability can be used
a second time (say, during your untap phase of a future turn), since
"once" seems to indicate that you cannot.

You'd have to use "Once during each of your untap phases, ..." if you
wanted to replace "During your untap phase, ..."


Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
Last edit: 07 Mar 2018 13:32 by Ankha.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Mar 2018 13:55 #85603 by Ankha
I don't know if "once per" would be applicable or not, and if the result would be clearer.

Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Mar 2018 15:13 #85605 by self biased
im at work and don't have time to scour the rulebook, but could a template be established to something like "once per untap phase" with the notation that these cards refer to your phases, and will specify other Methuselah's phases if applicable?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Moderators: AnkhaKraus
Time to create page: 0.092 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum