Group 1 and 6 together ?

With the new V5 expansion bringing back camarilla clans, its far more relevant!

Rather: First group and the last group

(not groups just #1 & 6 as that is going to change with future group #7 some day)

Lönkka wrote:

Rather: First group and the last group

(not groups just #1 & 6 as that is going to change with future group #7 some day)

I agree, but I hope that we are years from a group 7.

And I want a new tremere deck with lots of titled people

Lönkka wrote:

Rather: First group and the last group

(not groups just #1 & 6 as that is going to change with future group #7 some day)

Invalidating people's existing decks when a new group is released isn't particularly player-friendly.

Dear all,

Telling people that every deck has already been optimized is neither new player friendly

Group 1 vampires are "the forgotten", this idea of joining first and last group is a nice idea to offer update options to old crypt deck.
It can't be so bad without playtest.

My point : if group 7 ever exists (I hope not), the rule would have to be updated so there will be no problem if new Justicar appears.

I summon Igor and the league organization teams... let's give it a try!!!

Regards,
Rémi.

Rémi wrote:

Dear all,

Telling people that every deck has already been optimized is neither new player friendly

Group 1 vampires are "the forgotten", this idea of joining first and last group is a nice idea to offer update options to old crypt deck.
It can't be so bad without playtest.

My point : if group 7 ever exists (I hope not), the rule would have to be updated so there will be no problem if new Justicar appears.

I summon Igor and the league organization teams... let's give it a try!!!

Regards,
Rémi.

Remi you know what I concluded by testing the contesting crypt under the BC rule: people just don’t want to accept new ideas, they only accept imposed rules. so it's all up to the BC to decide, they should say simply: the first and last group can together or can't, and that's it!