BWAHAHAHAHA! The Great Beast becomes Baali, and ... CALLS THE GREAT BEAST! Oh the humanity!

I really don't want The Great Beast to regenerate like that. I mean, he's cute and cuddly and all, but that's too much smashing infernal death for one table.

Its to strong...

I will change to >5 capacity to play the card (harder to influence), increase the cost of the card by 1 (after all its better than sanguine), and remove the untap text.

Sterile should also be added to the target vampire...

Plenty of decks can use this card, power structure, palla grande, week of nightmares, death stars, even gargoyles can make a cheap rush deck.

wesile wrote:



I think that every time I see "Eyes of Argus" or "Deep Song" or "Conditioning."

There are always going to be certain card combinations that are really strong. That is a problem with a game where cards are not cycled out of play. There may be card combinations that were never tested during play-testing.

But that is the beauty of an online discussion forum: we can talk about ideas and a larger audience can pick it apart and give "what if?"s (or in this case, present cases of broken card combinations

This is a GOOD thing. You don't have to say "its to strong." All you have to do is say WHY it's too strong. I won't be offended. I have ideas all the time. Many of them are bad, or not thoroughly thought out. It's hard to consider how a card idea will work with thousands of other cards already in print. That is a huge consideration.