Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
×
Poll: Possible fixes for Pentex Subversion (was ended 0000-00-00 00:00:00)
| Total number of voters: 0 | |||
| Only registered users can participate to this poll |
28 Jun 2012 17:01 - 28 Jun 2012 17:01 #32589
by Jeff Kuta
You may play Pentex Subversion because you think large cap vampires dominate. But the fact is that large-cap vampires do not completely dominate the tournament metagame. What about Vignes? Weenie AUS and DEM are still strong. Shambling Hordes. Nana/ANI weenie rush. Malk94. Giovanni PowerBleed. All these mid-cap decks have won large tournaments in the past 18 months.
At least in combat, it is the minions interacting. I like combat. It should be better (just a touch). Pentex is a master card and therefore by definition doesn't (initially) involve minion interaction.
When you are anvil, be patient; when a hammer, strike.





pckvtes.wordpress.com
@pckvtes
Replied by Jeff Kuta on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
But people play Pentex subversion not because big cap deck exist. They play it because big cap dominate.
You may play Pentex Subversion because you think large cap vampires dominate. But the fact is that large-cap vampires do not completely dominate the tournament metagame. What about Vignes? Weenie AUS and DEM are still strong. Shambling Hordes. Nana/ANI weenie rush. Malk94. Giovanni PowerBleed. All these mid-cap decks have won large tournaments in the past 18 months.
But at the root, if you don't like Pentex because it can remove your bigger minion very early, you won't like any dedicated rush deck for this very reason.
Also, I don't believe Pentex discourage minion interaction at all. It's about the same thing as torpor, without diablerie.
At least in combat, it is the minions interacting. I like combat. It should be better (just a touch). Pentex is a master card and therefore by definition doesn't (initially) involve minion interaction.
When you are anvil, be patient; when a hammer, strike.
pckvtes.wordpress.com
@pckvtes
Last edit: 28 Jun 2012 17:01 by Jeff Kuta.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
28 Jun 2012 19:15 - 28 Jun 2012 19:15 #32591
by Ankha
(BTW, it's a coincidence I've quoted only Jeff, but apparently we disagree on many points, nothing personal
)
Replied by Ankha on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
How does this help?But IMO the problem with Pentex doesn't lie with breaking down a wall which has become entrenched. The problem with Pentex is that early in the game is can randomly shut a player out of the game entirely. V:TES is a social game. When each of us sits down at the table, we commit the next two hours of our lives to some (hopefully) friendly competition. When someone plays a turn 3 Pentex on your large capacity vampire, your game could be over in the next 10 minutes, even if you do get substantial help.
A single card should not have that kind of power early in the game.
<snip>
* Increase cost to 3 pool. Simple, easy to remember solution.
If Pentex is played more often than before, couldn't it mean it is needed more often? The card is not necessarily problematic, but as you say the power of super star deck is maybe.Year / TWDs Total / TWDs wPentex / %
1997-2008 / 1076 / 235 / 21.8% (prior to KoT/Ashur Tablets)
2009 / 236 / 111 / 47.0%
2010 / 231 / 130 / 56.2%
2011 / 253 / 144 / 56.9%
2012 / 89 / 62 / 69.7% (reports as of 6/26/2012)
Clearly we are experiencing some kind of trend. Large vampires got better specials and more disciplines in the last few published sets. Ergo, the advantages to playing with superstars grew as did the advantage of playing with the best superstar vampire counter card: Pentex(tm) Subversion.
The card should probably exist, but it *is* problematic, and the problem is getting worse.
Huh? 95% percent of the master cards involve minions. Blood Doll. Villein. Powerbase: Montreal. Zillah's Valley. Metro Underground. The Rack. The Coven. Dreams of the Sphinx (for influence). Hunting Grounds. Disciplines...Pentex is a master card and therefore by definition doesn't (initially) involve minion interaction.
(BTW, it's a coincidence I've quoted only Jeff, but apparently we disagree on many points, nothing personal
Last edit: 28 Jun 2012 19:15 by Ankha.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
28 Jun 2012 19:22 - 28 Jun 2012 19:23 #32592
by Ankha
Pentex can be also quite strategical when you have to wait the right moment to play it to oust your prey.
It also offers options to decks that would be locked otherwise. If I play a swarm deck, is it normal that 1 No Secrets From the Magaji locks me down? Pentex offers a solution.
Replied by Ankha on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
No, they play it to handle decks that put all their eggs in the same basket, or abuse the superstar principle to create a monster impossible to handle. Being a high cap usually grants some extra power (bleeding for 3 in 1 action is better than bleeding 3 times for 1). It should also have a drawback.But people play Pentex subversion not because big cap deck exist. They play it because big cap dominate
Pentex can be also quite strategical when you have to wait the right moment to play it to oust your prey.
It also offers options to decks that would be locked otherwise. If I play a swarm deck, is it normal that 1 No Secrets From the Magaji locks me down? Pentex offers a solution.
Last edit: 28 Jun 2012 19:23 by Ankha.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
28 Jun 2012 19:54 #32594
by Ohlmann
Or, to put in other words, there is three card that are solutions useable against about any deck : Direct Intervention, Sudden Reversal, and Pentex Subversion. Of the three, the Pentex still is the one which is the less disruptive in my opinion.
Replied by Ohlmann on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
I agree it's a way better way to explain it.No, they play it to handle decks that put all their eggs in the same basket, or abuse the superstar principle to create a monster impossible to handle. Being a high cap usually grants some extra power (bleeding for 3 in 1 action is better than bleeding 3 times for 1). It should also have a drawback.
Pentex can be also quite strategical when you have to wait the right moment to play it to oust your prey.
It also offers options to decks that would be locked otherwise. If I play a swarm deck, is it normal that 1 No Secrets From the Magaji locks me down? Pentex offers a solution.
Or, to put in other words, there is three card that are solutions useable against about any deck : Direct Intervention, Sudden Reversal, and Pentex Subversion. Of the three, the Pentex still is the one which is the less disruptive in my opinion.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
28 Jun 2012 20:04 #32595
by Juggernaut1981
Master cards interact with minions. Minions interact with Master cards... BUT when Jeff Kuta is talking about "Minion Interaction" he doesn't mean: "The master cards have effects on minions..." Generally Jeff (and a few others, myself included) think of "Minion Interaction" as the interplay between 2 or more minions during the play of the game.
My dislike for Pentex is the "early game neutering" effect. It can be achieved by other decks doing similar things (on case from my own recent play is being Banished three turns in a row by my predator... very very boring game). It makes you wonder why you bothered to put the cards in sleeves and waste your time on the trip to the game. It gets worse if it is a tournament because then you know your chances of getting into finals have probably been smashed AND that you might as well not have forked out your entry fee (here's your token booster, thanks for coming to subsidise that asshole's winnings).




Retired Baron of Sydney, Australia, 418
Replied by Juggernaut1981 on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
Huh? 95% percent of the master cards involve minions. Blood Doll. Villein. Powerbase: Montreal. Zillah's Valley. Metro Underground. The Rack. The Coven. Dreams of the Sphinx (for influence). Hunting Grounds. Disciplines...Pentex is a master card and therefore by definition doesn't (initially) involve minion interaction.
Master cards interact with minions. Minions interact with Master cards... BUT when Jeff Kuta is talking about "Minion Interaction" he doesn't mean: "The master cards have effects on minions..." Generally Jeff (and a few others, myself included) think of "Minion Interaction" as the interplay between 2 or more minions during the play of the game.
My dislike for Pentex is the "early game neutering" effect. It can be achieved by other decks doing similar things (on case from my own recent play is being Banished three turns in a row by my predator... very very boring game). It makes you wonder why you bothered to put the cards in sleeves and waste your time on the trip to the game. It gets worse if it is a tournament because then you know your chances of getting into finals have probably been smashed AND that you might as well not have forked out your entry fee (here's your token booster, thanks for coming to subsidise that asshole's winnings).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Juggernaut1981
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2377
- Thank you received: 327
28 Jun 2012 20:47 - 28 Jun 2012 20:48 #32596
by AaronC
Those decks already have several drawbacks. They get fewer actions. They have one principal target for rushes and blocks. They usually take longer to influence out their vampire or have to dedicate deck space to acceleration. These are significant penalties.
I am not at all sure that spending 11 pool to bleed for three with one action is better than spending 3 to 6 pool to bleed for one with three actions.
My experience is that it takes several actions and drawing the right cards to turn a great vampire into an unstoppable monster. Two pool, an MPA, and some chump blockers can nullify that considerable investment.
I think everyone who has posted here agrees with the ability of the Pentex Subversion to remove a blocker from play in order to lunge or to break a "block everything" superstar deck. (I know some players don't like that aspect, of course.)
What we're discussing is the ability of Pentex to prevent superstars from acting at all.
Replied by AaronC on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
No, they play it to handle decks that put all their eggs in the same basket, or abuse the superstar principle to create a monster impossible to handle. Being a high cap usually grants some extra power (bleeding for 3 in 1 action is better than bleeding 3 times for 1). It should also have a drawback.
Those decks already have several drawbacks. They get fewer actions. They have one principal target for rushes and blocks. They usually take longer to influence out their vampire or have to dedicate deck space to acceleration. These are significant penalties.
I am not at all sure that spending 11 pool to bleed for three with one action is better than spending 3 to 6 pool to bleed for one with three actions.
My experience is that it takes several actions and drawing the right cards to turn a great vampire into an unstoppable monster. Two pool, an MPA, and some chump blockers can nullify that considerable investment.
Pentex can be also quite strategical when you have to wait the right moment to play it to oust your prey.
It also offers options to decks that would be locked otherwise. If I play a swarm deck, is it normal that 1 No Secrets From the Magaji locks me down? Pentex offers a solution.
I think everyone who has posted here agrees with the ability of the Pentex Subversion to remove a blocker from play in order to lunge or to break a "block everything" superstar deck. (I know some players don't like that aspect, of course.)
What we're discussing is the ability of Pentex to prevent superstars from acting at all.
Last edit: 28 Jun 2012 20:48 by AaronC.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Reyda
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.081 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Polling forum
- Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
