Ignore aggravated vs treat aggravated as normal

Hello
If i treat aggravated damage as normal, but also ignore aggravated damage: do i burn blood or not when i receive aggro?

To be more specific i was thinking about Nergal that plays Ignore the Searing Flames during his action, then using Force of Will + Daring the Dawn. Nergal has Concordance on him so he treats aggravated damage as normal
Sorry for a lots of rules questions, but my mind is wicked and i am trying some insane combos.

galliard wrote:

Hello
If i treat aggravated damage as normal, but also ignore aggravated damage: do i burn blood or not when i receive aggro?

No - you are immune to it.

However, if you treat aggravated damage as normal, and ignore normal damage, you would also burn no blood when normal or aggravated damage would be inflicted on you. [LSJ 20100527]

galliard wrote:

To be more specific i was thinking about Nergal that plays Ignore the Searing Flames during his action, then using Force of Will + Daring the Dawn. Nergal has Concordance on him so he treats aggravated damage as normal

I wouldn't recommend that.
Well, first, I would recommend quoting cardtexts:

Name: Ignore the Searing Flames
Cardtype: Combat[/colo]
Discipline: Daimoinon/Serpentis
[ser] This vampire treats all aggravated damage from the opposing minion's strike as normal damage. Only usable when the opposing minion inflicts aggravated damage on this vampire.
[dai] Prevent all aggravated damage from the opposing minion's strike.
[DAI] This vampire burns 1 blood to be immune to aggravated damage for the remainder of the round.

Name: Daring the Dawn
Cardtype: Action Modifier
Discipline: Fortitude
[for] Vampires cannot block this action. The acting vampire takes 2 unpreventable aggravated damage after the action resolves.
[FOR] As above, but the acting vampire takes 1 unpreventable aggravated damage.

Name: Force of Will
Cardtype: Action
Cost: 1 blood
Discipline: Fortitude
Only usable by a tapped vampire.
[for] Bleed with +1 bleed. After resolution, this vampire takes 2 unpreventable aggravated damage even if the action is blocked.
[FOR] As above, but with +2 bleed, and the acting vampire takes only 1 unpreventable aggravated damage.

Ignore the Searing Flames only affects damage inflicted during combat, not after resolution (Daring the Dawn, Force of Will).

Concordance would work, though (but you would burn blood to heal Force of Will and Daring the Dawn's damage).

Thank you. I misunderstood round of fight with Metuselah turn.
So Ignore Searing Flame is best used with Dawn Operation.

galliard wrote:

Thank you. I misunderstood round of fight with Metuselah turn.
So Ignore Searing Flame is best used with Dawn Operation.

I'm not sure what "best" means, when the cards don't interact.
Daring the Dawn is best used with Jua Vema, for instance.

But they do interact. You burn just one blood with ItSF, and are immune to any damage in combat after Dawn Operation. You can do anything to opponent

But they do interact. You burn just one blood with ItSF, and are immune to any damage in combat after Dawn Operation. You can do anything to opponent

But they do interact. You burn just one blood with ItSF, and are immune to any damage in THAT ROUND after Dawn Operation. You can do anything to opponent

One press, and you risk collecting that very agg damage yourself. Not a major nuisance, but still a risk to have in mind.