Contested City Title

FWIW, LSJ explained why it was removed:

[LSJ 20000515]

LSJ wrote:

> I don't see a game balance issue and I thought it was a nifty way of
> handling a power struggle within a city. Certainly none of that
> "confusion" or "common sense" stuff creeping in. Hell, I don't even
> remember anybody complaining about it in the newsgroup.

For the same reason Paralyze (and, I suspect, "Close Quarters") got
dropped: highly limited scope without suitable justification.
I.e., rulebook simplification.

Personally, during the time it was possible to rush each other, I don't think I ever saw anyone do it.

Pascal wrote:

Robert wrote:

Pascal wrote:

Correct answer from prestonp.

Preston asked the question, I believe you meant to state that Andrew (TorranceCircle) had the correct answer. Are either (or both) of you going to attend the L.A. Memorial weekend tournaments?

Ah, yep, I scrolled a bit too fast =)

I won't be attending the LA Memorial tournament.

It would be cool if you could show, Pascal, but I was asking Preston and Andrew who are from around the L.A. area.

Robert wrote:

.....

I won't be attending the LA Memorial tournament.

It would be cool if you could show, Pascal, but I was asking Preston and Andrew who are from around the L.A. area.

It would be cool if you came out Pascal. To celebrate PSG winning their league!

As for me, I'll be there.