file Re: Vlad Tepes + Regent

04 Mar 2015 14:20 #69647 by Lech
Replied by Lech on topic Re: Vlad Tepes + Regent
How can beast clan impersonate ?

:laso: :CEL: :DOM: :OBT: :POT: :cap8:
Sabbat.Black Hand Shakar: Lech loathe ranged weapons. Once each action, he may burn 1 blood to become Camarilla Prince of Krakow until the end of the action.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Mar 2015 14:39 - 04 Mar 2015 14:43 #69648 by Pascal Bertrand
Powerbase: Madrid is not a card that requires a sect or a title, so its only interaction with Vlad Tepes is about burning the counters on the card.

Purchase Pact does require a title, but is used by a Methuselah ("you can ...", rather than "a [titled] vampire can...")

So, no to both.


@Jamesatzephyr: Beast cannot take the action to burn the Shackles - similarly, a vampire with Potence under Drawing Out the Beast cannot strike: burn the Meat Hook (I'm pretty sure there's a ruling somewhere for this one)
Last edit: 04 Mar 2015 14:43 by Pascal Bertrand.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Mar 2015 16:34 #69650 by jamesatzephyr

How can beast clan impersonate ?


Should have been more of a hypothetical than a real question.


Powerbase: Madrid is not a card that requires a sect or a title, so its only interaction with Vlad Tepes is about burning the counters on the card.


Oh, duh, I managed to mis-read it as the (D) action requiring a titled vampire.

similarly, a vampire with Potence under Drawing Out the Beast cannot strike: burn the Meat Hook (I'm pretty sure there's a ruling somewhere for this one)


Ooh, neat. I forgot about Meat Hook. [LSJ 20101217]

> Does the strike to destroy it count
> as "using" the equipment?

Yes, for the vampire striking to destroy it.

That is, if the vampire opposing the Meat Hook bearer is prohibited
from using weapons, then xe cannot strike to destroy the Meat Hook.



So on that score:

Purchase Pact is in play. Can Vlad Tepes call the +1 stealth political action to burn it? "Requires a ready archbishop, priscus, cardinal or regent. ... Any titled Sabbat vampire may call a referendum to burn this card as a +1 stealth political action."

What about Powerbase: New York? "Any Sabbat vampire controlled by another Methuselah can take a (D) action to move all the blood on the 'base to his or her controller's blood pool."

The reason for the two eaxmples is that Purchase Pact requires a title to play, but also to use the action. Powerbase: NY does not require a title or sect to play, but does require a sect to use its move action.
The following user(s) said Thank You: extrala

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Mar 2015 21:56 - 04 Mar 2015 21:58 #69653 by Pascal Bertrand

Purchase Pact is in play. Can Vlad Tepes call the +1 stealth political action to burn it? "Requires a ready archbishop, priscus, cardinal or regent. ... Any titled Sabbat vampire may call a referendum to burn this card as a +1 stealth political action."

Yes.

What about Powerbase: New York? "Any Sabbat vampire controlled by another Methuselah can take a (D) action to move all the blood on the 'base to his or her controller's blood pool."

No, the card (Powerbase: New York) doesn't require a vampire with a specific title / sect, so Vlad cannot use it.

The reason for the two eaxmples is that Purchase Pact requires a title to play, but also to use the action. Powerbase: NY does not require a title or sect to play, but does require a sect to use its move action.

Which is why Vlad's cardtext allows Vlad to use Purchase Pact, but not to use Powerbase: New York.


EDIT: If we had a card such as:
"Requires a Sabbat vampire.
Put this card in play. Any Camarilla vampire can enter combat with a Sabbat vampire as a +1 stealth (D) action."
Vlad couldn't use it to enter combat with anyone, as the card requires a Sabbat vampire and doesn't grant anything to Sabbat vampires.
Last edit: 04 Mar 2015 21:58 by Pascal Bertrand.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Mar 2015 22:31 - 04 Mar 2015 23:08 #69654 by jamesatzephyr

EDIT: If we had a card such as:
"Requires a Sabbat vampire.
Put this card in play. Any Camarilla vampire can enter combat with a Sabbat vampire as a +1 stealth (D) action."
Vlad couldn't use it to enter combat with anyone, as the card requires a Sabbat vampire and doesn't grant anything to Sabbat vampires.


How about Inquisitor or Archon?
Requires a ready archbishop, cardinal or regent.
... Any Sabbat vampire may call a referendum to burn this card as a +1 stealth political action.

Requires a prince or justicar.
...Any Camarilla vampire can call a referendum to burn this card as a +1 stealth political action.


Also, what happens if Vlad plays Anarch Secession? Can he choose to be a Prince/Archbishop of somewhere for the purposes of playing the card, and thus become the Baron of somewhere?
+1 stealth action. Requires a ready, non-anarch, titled vampire.
...If he or she had a city title, put this card on him or her as a title card to represent the title of baron of the same city.


Does Abbot's in-play effect count as using the card?
+1 stealth action. Requires a Sabbat vampire.
Put this card on this acting Sabbat vampire and untap him or her. This Sabbat vampire gets +1 intercept against (D) actions directed at his or her controller.


Can he use an in-play Under Siege?
+1 stealth action. Unique. Requires a titled Sabbat vampire.
Put this card in play with 3 counters. Once each action, a Sabbat vampire you control can burn 1 counter from this card to untap and attempt to block with +1 intercept, even if intercept is not yet needed.

Note that Under Siege works differently to - say - Pentex(tm) Loves You (Which wouldn't work for Vlad anyhow), where that sort of card definitely has the Methuselah doing the thing. This appears to be written that Vlad burns the counter - is he using it then?
Last edit: 04 Mar 2015 23:08 by jamesatzephyr.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Mar 2015 07:21 #69659 by alek
Replied by alek on topic Re: Vlad Tepes + Regent
looks like this guy alone requires a TON of clarifications
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mårten, Thalco

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Moderators: AnkhaKraus
Time to create page: 0.092 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum