Suggestion: community manager

The crap to not-crap ratio in that forum is very, very high.

Some of the design team members read this forum, from time to time.

Dorrinal wrote:

The crap to not-crap ratio in that forum is very, very high.

I disagree.

With that out of the way, I will easily admit that the designers hardly need to comb much, if any, of that forum's posts in order to fill the 35-odd slots of a new card set.


Drain

Dorrinal wrote:

The crap to not-crap ratio in that forum is very, very high.

Crap can give very useful insight.

direwolf wrote:

Crap can give very useful insight.

Only as long as it's the right kind of crap, that has passed through the right kind of people. I mean, almost by definition, people who are desperate enough to spend a lot of time posting here probably don't have adequately fertile crap.

I mean, the hoi polloi, come on...

Aaron wrote:

direwolf wrote:

Crap can give very useful insight.

Only as long as it's the right kind of crap, that has passed through the right kind of people. I mean, almost by definition, people who are desperate enough to spend a lot of time posting here probably don't have adequately fertile crap.

I mean, the hoi polloi, come on...

Well, we have to presume the design team has a decent crap filter. But the point i failed to make because I didn't elaborate is that even if an idea is not thoroughly thought through or tested, it may be a different way to approach a problem. Maybe that idea isn't perfect for the proposed card, but maybe it will translate well into another idea.