Outdated rulings

Ankha wrote:

Pascal wrote:

Correct answers from Ankha and jamesatzephyr.

If Dragos plays Telepathic tracking, the cost of that card is 0 blood, regardlessly of whether the opposing vampire played a Terror Frenzy or not.

Does it really reduce the card cost? How many blood would Watenda have to pay to cancel it?

Terror Frenzy increases the cost, so Telepathic Tracking would have a cost of 2 blood, which Dragos would not pay.

Watenda would have to pay the 2 blood to cancel the card.

Ah, yes, sorry for that. I was looking a bit in the future.
Telepathic Tracking's cost would, in this case, be 2 blood, of which Dragos pays none.

Adonai wrote:

Ankha wrote:

Pascal wrote:

Correct answers from Ankha and jamesatzephyr.

If Dragos plays Telepathic tracking, the cost of that card is 0 blood, regardlessly of whether the opposing vampire played a Terror Frenzy or not.

Does it really reduce the card cost? How many blood would Watenda have to pay to cancel it?

Terror Frenzy increases the cost, so Telepathic Tracking would have a cost of 2 blood, which Dragos would not pay.

Watenda would have to pay the 2 blood to cancel the card.

Moot point given Watenda don't have anyway.

Ankha wrote:

Lech wrote:

Moot point given Watenda don't have anyway.

Not even with two Animalism skills?

If skill cards (and equivalent) and clan impersonation (mostly to malkavian) hadn't existed, ruling would have been boring...

(just asking : is "didn't existed" correct?)