Outdated rulings

Pascal can you give us a final reply about Dragos and Terror Frenzy or modify/delete the old rules?

We have a player that can't accept the fact of the Terror Frenzy text changes and want to play based on old rules.

Thanks

Sydnelson wrote:

Pascal can you give us a final reply about Dragos and Terror Frenzy or modify/delete the old rules?

The ruling was declared obsolete in 2009, though LSJ didn't get round to updating the rulings file. (It appeared that after the White Wolf website moved to a PHP driven thing, LSJ no longer had the direct ability to update the website, so updates were much slower.)


[LSJ 20090107]

LSJ wrote:

> {Dragos:
> If Dragos's opponent plays superior Terror Frenzy, Dragos has to burn
> one blood for each combat card he plays in that combat. [LSJ
> 19990223] }
>
> And since
>
> {Terror Frenzy:
> Superior Terror Frenzy affects card costs. [LSJ 20070829] }
>
> Dragos no longer (again) has to pay the combat cards cost or
> additional card costs...
>
...
I'll remove the obsolete ruling above. Let me know if you find any other
obsolete rulings there.

LSJ also ruled on this in 2007. [LSJ 20070829]

LSJ wrote:

> If so, Dragos, for example, won't have to pay the extra blood of
> Terror Frenzy (as explicited in the 7/7/7 RTR), but he still has to
> burn blood for effects like superior Chiropteran Marauder.
Correct.

Correct answers from Ankha and jamesatzephyr.

If Dragos plays Telepathic tracking, the cost of that card is 0 blood, regardlessly of whether the opposing vampire played a Terror Frenzy or not.

Perfect , thank you Pascal.

Regards!

Pascal wrote:

Correct answers from Ankha and jamesatzephyr.

If Dragos plays Telepathic tracking, the cost of that card is 0 blood, regardlessly of whether the opposing vampire played a Terror Frenzy or not.

Thanks for reply, I will forward this to local list.