Torpor

Timo wrote:

Oh yes of course.
I was answering to Ohlman stating that empy malk HAD to hunt during other meth turn if empty with MN.

My bad for the misleading lack of precision.

I as persuaded otherwise. Sorry.

Ok i see now, I thought one your vampire reached 0 it was in torpor, but it needs to suffer 1 more point and off it goes to torpor. But, Aggravated damage sends a vampire to torpor regardless of how much damage was done to it. Does that mean if a vampire does 1 point of aggravated damage it sends my vampire to torpor??

Josephdmorse wrote:

Does that mean if a vampire does 1 point of aggravated damage it sends my vampire to torpor??

yes.

If a vampire has zero blood and takes any amount of non-aggravated damage, he goes to torpor and the extra damage is ignored.

If a vampire with one blood takes 3 aggravated damage, the first point sends him to torpor, the vamp burns one blood to prevent being burned from the second point of aggravated damage, and then the vampire burns because it cannot burn another blood from the third point of aggravated damage.

self wrote:

If a vampire with one blood takes 3 aggravated damage, the first point sends him to torpor, the vamp burns one blood to prevent being burned from the second point of aggravated damage, and then the vampire burns because it cannot burn another blood from the third point of aggravated damage.[/i]

To be more accurate: If the three damage are inflicted at the same time, the first damage wounds him, the second causes the vampire to burn 1 blood to prevent destruction, and the third one burns the vampire.

In this scenario, Fame wouldn't be triggered.