Card idea: Inconnu Meddling

Ankha wrote:

Suoli wrote:

What I'd like to see is a reason for non-bleed focused decks to play it (although your examples are a nice list of decks that would benefit from the card, now that I think about it).

There are quite a list of vampires (mainly) that interacts with the Edge, and I think more cards could interact with it too (if ever more cards were printed).

It just occurred to me that letting someone else keep one edge while you take the other doesn't actually help Enticement etc. any more than it helps regular decks. The card is only advantageous to any one deck builder if
a) you can simultaneously control both edges,
b) you want the table to bloat more or
c) you're using that crappy action modifier that lets you steal the edge from the target of a d-action.
Option b has problems similar to Montreal, option c is too narrow. Option a may or may not be too advantageous for s&b decks but that's a fixable problem.

Ankha wrote:

Pascal wrote:

If it's a master that doesn't go into play, it's tricky (you're creating a rule (that part about getting the edge anew) that exists because the card was played, though it's in an ash heap now. Not great (see Vampiric Disease and stuff).

Not trickier than having the regular Edge into play. Usually players have something representing the edge, they'll need a second one. An once the second one is in play, there's nothing else to remember.

With 2 players left and 2 edges, the odds of having the game timeout are quite higher than with just 1 edge.