Bauble question

The vampire who IS the equipment burns, but the Equipment does NOT burn is what you are saying?

If the card, Bauble, burns does the equipment, that the card, Bauble, put into play, burn as well?

XZealot wrote:

The vampire who IS the equipment burns, but the Equipment does NOT burn is what you are saying?

I don't understand your question. Vampires aren't equipment - which vampire are you referring to, in Ankha's example, with this?

Bauble doesn't have the cascading burn effect that exists in Dual Form.

XZealot wrote:

If the card Bauble burns, does the equipment, the card Bauble put into play, burn as well?

Hm, can you check I replaced the commas properly?
If it is, the answer is no.
The old trick is to play Bauble with Callirus (see [LSJ 20090113] for instance).

The thing is: the only way the equipment Bauble fetched burns is to choose to have it burn via Bauble's cardtext - or to have it burned otherway. if Bauble burns in any other way than via its cardtext (Scourge of the Enochians, Amaranth, ...), this won't burn the equipment.

XZealot wrote:

If the card, Bauble, burns does the equipment, that the card, Bauble, put into play, burn as well?

Again, no.

Refer to the cardtext, not to the real-world logic, to determine that. Bauble don't say the equipment burn with either the vampire or the bauble.