Seeds of Corruption clarifications

The card does not work. It is bad code. Get rid of it.

Klaital wrote:

Not sure about Mimir though.

The precedent of Lena Rowe suggests that his "no playing masters on him" text is likely to still be in effect, while under Seeds of Corruption.

[LSJ 20011106]

LSJ wrote:

#6. Lena Rowe still cannot do political actions to gain titles or gain a title.

And I'd class the passive "cannot gain a title" (from whatever source e.g. cross-table Investiture) in the same way as Mimir's no masters clause.

BenPeal wrote:

The card does not work. It is bad code. Get rid of it.

I love how the rulebook defines abilities given by equipment and retainers as "special abilities." Can we ban the rulebook too?

TwoRazorReign wrote:

BenPeal wrote:

The card does not work. It is bad code. Get rid of it.

I love how the rulebook defines abilities given by equipment and retainers as "special abilities." Can we ban the rulebook too?

Hey, at least that's in the rulebook, unlike the paragraph of text that's required to get Seeds of Corruption to "work".

BenPeal wrote:

TwoRazorReign wrote:

BenPeal wrote:

The card does not work. It is bad code. Get rid of it.

I love how the rulebook defines abilities given by equipment and retainers as "special abilities." Can we ban the rulebook too?

Hey, at least that's in the rulebook, unlike the paragraph of text that's required to get Seeds of Corruption to "work".

Thats nothing compared to the amount of rulings there is about Mata Hari.

Mask of 1k Faces anyone?