What is expected in the Rule Question forums

jhattara wrote:

Ankha wrote:

Ke. wrote:

Correct. Which makes some sense as he will be an Inner Circle member (+2 bleed standard).

It doesn't "make sense" since there's no standard for Inner Circles. For instance, Hardestadt has only +1 bleed.

Hardestadt has +2 Strength and Josef von Bauren +1 stealth instead of the second +bleed. Otherwise that +2 bleed is standard.

Per rule, Inner Circles are not granted to have +2 bleed. So it makes no sense rule-wise that Al-Ashrad has +2 bleed. Just like it makes no sense that Dogs can ride bikes.
Nevertheless, the answer is correct. Effects from the base version and from the advanced version are cumulative.

I was just pointing out the fact that it's the Rules Questions forum, and that the sentence I quoted ("Which makes some sense as he will be an Inner Circle member (+2 bleed standard).") has nothing to do with rules.
I may appear psychorigid,; truth is I prefer to keep the Rules Questions straight to the facts.

Now you can speak freely. I sensed that you were restricted in the Rules Question forum

My question is: is it pertinent to say in the Rules Question forum something such as:

"Beast, The Leatherface of Detroit, has +1 strength. Which makes some sense as he has big muscles"?

(Having big muscles is as related to the +1 strength bonus as being Inner Circle is related to having +2 bleed.)

What if later someone points out: "I can't understand why X doesn't have +1 strength, as he has big muscles. It would make some sense."

Or the dreaded: "Underbridge shouldn't be able to use vehicles. It doesn't make sense."

You have 2 hours to answer