- Foro
- V:TES Discussion
- Generic V:TES Discussion
- Increasing accessibility to V:TES, and Layout changes to make that happen.
Increasing accessibility to V:TES, and Layout changes to make that happen.
23 Feb 2024 09:04 #110770
by Lönkka
Replied by Lönkka on topic Layout change suggestion for Library cards.
Carlton as "Juggernaut's suggestions" looks best so far and I think it would look even better without the dividing line.
Finnish Politics!
The following user(s) said Thank You: self biased
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
25 Feb 2024 08:19 #110778
by beslin igor
Replied by beslin igor on topic Layout change suggestion for Library cards.
just to mention for hordes,text is: when enter play remove ally,not only recruit,because if they enter in play in diferent way,you also need to remove ally....
and I like your changes proposal,both proposal are good.
and I like your changes proposal,both proposal are good.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- beslin igor
- Offline
- Antediluvian
Less
More
- Posts: 666
- Thank you received: 130
26 Feb 2024 23:20 - 27 Feb 2024 00:47 #110790
by Oracle.kid
Replied by Oracle.kid on topic Layout change suggestion for Library cards.
For Shambling Hordes, the layout is better as-is imo, but could perhaps be improved even further:
3 life, 0 strength, 0 bleed. Zombie. +1 strength per life.
Cannot gain life.When put into play, remove an ally or vampire in your ash heap.
D-Action: Enter combat with a minion.
inf: Hordes enter play with 3 life.
sup: Hordes enter play with 4 life.
Last edit: 27 Feb 2024 00:47 by Oracle.kid.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Oracle.kid
- Offline
- Neonate
Less
More
- Posts: 24
- Thank you received: 10
06 Apr 2024 23:16 #111125
by self biased
Replied by self biased on topic Layout change suggestion for Library cards.
I made a facebook post about Political actions, but i've since run out of steam to post the results here. maybe i'll have the energy later tonight or tomorrow. but the TL;DR is that Political actions should look similar to this (but i've already iterated past this design):
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- self biased
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Antediluvian
- I pray at an altar of farts.
Less
More
- Posts: 822
- Thank you received: 354
08 Apr 2024 16:33 #111143
by Oracle.kid
Replied by Oracle.kid on topic Layout change suggestion for Library cards.
this is great
Alastor is the trickiest imo. I would find it best if your layout for action cards could somehow be integrated, too. Maybe along the lines like below?
Success: Place this card on the chosen vampire. Place an equipment card from your Library on the chosen vampire. Pay half the cost (round down) of the equipment.
Permanent: A vampire may have only one Alastor. This vampire cannot commit diablerie.
[action symbol] +1 stealth Enter combat with any vampire controlled by another Methuselah.
Alastor is the trickiest imo. I would find it best if your layout for action cards could somehow be integrated, too. Maybe along the lines like below?
Success: Place this card on the chosen vampire. Place an equipment card from your Library on the chosen vampire. Pay half the cost (round down) of the equipment.
Permanent: A vampire may have only one Alastor. This vampire cannot commit diablerie.
[action symbol] +1 stealth Enter combat with any vampire controlled by another Methuselah.
The following user(s) said Thank You: self biased
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Oracle.kid
- Offline
- Neonate
Less
More
- Posts: 24
- Thank you received: 10
09 Apr 2024 06:56 #111146
by ResurrectioN
Replied by ResurrectioN on topic Increasing accessibility to V:TES, and Layout changes to make that happen.
TBH, I'm "confused" by the Terms section on political actions.
On Alastor, it makes sense, but then on Crusade seems strange.
All referendums pass or fail, so it's redundant.
... and maybe that's the reason we don't have a good template.
Things can differ so much that it's easier to have a wall of text than card sections that could work for all cards :/
Thanks for the effort of making these!
On Alastor, it makes sense, but then on Crusade seems strange.
All referendums pass or fail, so it's redundant.
... and maybe that's the reason we don't have a good template.
Things can differ so much that it's easier to have a wall of text than card sections that could work for all cards :/
Thanks for the effort of making these!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ResurrectioN
- Offline
- Neonate
Less
More
- Posts: 39
- Thank you received: 12
- Foro
- V:TES Discussion
- Generic V:TES Discussion
- Increasing accessibility to V:TES, and Layout changes to make that happen.
Time to create page: 0.097 seconds
- You are here:
- Home
- Foro
- V:TES Discussion
- Generic V:TES Discussion
- Increasing accessibility to V:TES, and Layout changes to make that happen.