"My Enemy's Enemy" with 2 players left

Is "My Enemy's Enemy" superior playable with only 2 players at the table?

Name: My Enemy's Enemy
[aus] +1 intercept.
[AUS] Only usable when a minion controlled by your predator is bleeding you, after blocks are declined. Lock this reacting vampire. The acting minion is now bleeding your predator's predator.

There is a LSJ ruling on this matter, but I cannot find it right now. Is that still valid?

Strange enough, the card text on "Lackey" explicitely reads that "My Enemy's Enemy" is NOT usable in a 2 player game. Why so?

Thanks in advance.

Not playable because the Rulebook says:
6.1.1. Bleed
Some cards or effects may allow or force you to bleed a Methuselah other than your prey. You can never bleed yourself, however.

I see what you meant. Actually I see no reason why it is not playable, but it is still useless.

Hakuron wrote:

Is "My Enemy's Enemy" superior playable with only 2 players at the table?

Yes. Unlike most bouncers, it doesn't ask you to choose another Methuselah etc.

[LSJ 20060525]

LSJ wrote:

> You can use My Enemy's Enemy to send it back to you... Right? If it's
> down to 2 players... Not sure how's that's helpful...

Yes. It is useful in that it moves the card -- you might draw something
useful.

Or it'll get you closer to decking and then you can withdraw.

Note that the ordinary re-opening of blockers that you get at this point wither other bounce cards doesn't apply, because the target hasn't changed.

www.vekn.net/general-rulings

Sadly, Amaranth version of my enemy's enemy reports a variation stating that cannot be played In 2 players. Why there's such variations? (Not only in this card anyway)