On Lilith's Blessing 3. "problematic card"

Sudden wrote:

2a

Please don't vote yet, there will be an extra pollthread. I was just making sure, that I can take those options for the poll. Thanks.

This is just a random thought. I don’t like to change card text and prefer not to ban a card. So without changing card text, what would happen if the keyword “Bahari” was defined in the rulebook as a sect like Cam, Sabbat, Laibon. Becoming Bahari would change your sect. Would this make the card “better”? What problems would this create? Since you would lose your title it would make it easier to go Anarch (which may be a good thing?).

david.tatu wrote:

This is just a random thought. I don’t like to change card text and prefer not to ban a card. So without changing card text, what would happen if the keyword “Bahari” was defined in the rulebook as a sect like Cam, Sabbat, Laibon. Becoming Bahari would change your sect. Would this make the card “better”? What problems would this create? Since you would lose your title it would make it easier to go Anarch (which may be a good thing?).

I like that idea very much. This would make the use of LB not desirable for titled vamps (who doesn't want to become anarch after the use) and could open a good hook to introduce Baharicards. So an abuse of LB for just getting three blood on my villeined IC wouldn't be good anymore because of losing the title through the change of sect. I like that.

Making bahari sect would solve some problems with the card.

I wait some more time with the poll on this one because I think we need it to think about David's suggestion.

You have to be careful by just making it a sect as vampire can easily change sect to lose Bahari status and be a valid target for Lilith's Blessing again.

It does open up amusing bad cards like Revocation of Tyre and such to change all your Bahari vampires into something else.

What about making Bahari an Infernal like keyword that works similar but requires blood on the vampire to untap or some other mechanic.