file On Liquidation 5. "problematic card"

21 Nov 2011 21:44 #15354 by Brum
:PRO:
It is completely fine.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
22 Nov 2011 10:54 #15445 by alek
PRO
it's a good and balanced card

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
22 Nov 2011 11:34 #15451 by elotar
:PRO:

We just need to ban Ashurs and imbued.

:splat: NC Russia
:DEM::san::nec::cap4:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
22 Nov 2011 11:37 #15452 by Ankha
PRO & CON

I don't like the card because its drawback isn't a real disavantage. If one plays Liquidation, it's certain it has some recursion effects in order to take advantage of it. I've never seen a deck where Liquidation would be played without Ashur or Sudario...

This being said, the card itself isn't that wrong, it's the recursion cards that may be a trouble. It could be a 2 pool gain and be still playable.

Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
22 Nov 2011 13:25 #15468 by Izaak
Dreams is 2 poolgain and can be used for extra cards (controlled Liquidation, basically) and crypt acceleration. This is all somewhat offset by the fact that it's unique, but I feel Dreams is ALREADY superior to Liquidation. Making it 2 pool would make this a non-discussion.
The following user(s) said Thank You: henrik

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
26 Nov 2011 19:01 #16068 by Joscha
Would this poll reflects the discussion correctly?

a) No change.
b) Let the 7 cards go out of the game.
c) Gain only 2 pool.
d) Ban the card.

Baron of Frankfurt

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Moderators: AnkhaKraus
Time to create page: 0.136 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum