On Liquidation 5. "problematic card"
21 Nov 2011 21:44 #15354
by Brum
It is completely fine.
Replied by Brum on topic Re: On Liquidation 5. "problematic card"
It is completely fine.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 Nov 2011 11:34 #15451
by elotar
We just need to ban Ashursand imbued.
NC Russia
Replied by elotar on topic Re: On Liquidation 5. "problematic card"
We just need to ban Ashurs
NC Russia
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
22 Nov 2011 11:37 #15452
by Ankha
Replied by Ankha on topic Re: On Liquidation 5. "problematic card"
PRO & CON
I don't like the card because its drawback isn't a real disavantage. If one plays Liquidation, it's certain it has some recursion effects in order to take advantage of it. I've never seen a deck where Liquidation would be played without Ashur or Sudario...
This being said, the card itself isn't that wrong, it's the recursion cards that may be a trouble. It could be a 2 pool gain and be still playable.
I don't like the card because its drawback isn't a real disavantage. If one plays Liquidation, it's certain it has some recursion effects in order to take advantage of it. I've never seen a deck where Liquidation would be played without Ashur or Sudario...
This being said, the card itself isn't that wrong, it's the recursion cards that may be a trouble. It could be a 2 pool gain and be still playable.
Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.098 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Foro
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Card Balance & Strategy Discussion
- On Liquidation 5. "problematic card"