Walk of Flame
06 Dec 2012 15:38 #42468
by Ohlmann
Replied by Ohlmann on topic Re: WALK OF FLAME
At this point, it's about as easy to make work as Ahriman's Demesne.
(then again, if you see way too much animalism combat, theft + walk and relying on your opponent to press can actually teach some lessons)
(then again, if you see way too much animalism combat, theft + walk and relying on your opponent to press can actually teach some lessons)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
06 Dec 2012 15:43 - 06 Dec 2012 15:48 #42469
by Eius P
Replied by Eius P on topic Re: WALK OF FLAME
Yeah... It's more fun than reliable!
I'd play with these and walk of flame if I had more than one
combat card
Bond with the mountain:
tha: dodge with an optional press
Cost: 1 blood
I'd play with these and walk of flame if I had more than one
combat card
Bond with the mountain:
tha: dodge with an optional press
Cost: 1 blood
Last edit: 06 Dec 2012 15:48 by Eius P.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
06 Dec 2012 18:41 #42479
by Kiddo
Bond with the Mountain goes in such decks that pack lots of Mirror Walks but don't have big enough vamps to play Obediences in case they do end up in combat.
I own 4 Bonds and never have I combined these two cards in a deck - it was either Thefts + Apportations + an occasional Walk or Mirror walks/Obediences + Rego Motus + Wind Dance/Bond with the Mountain...
Replied by Kiddo on topic Re: WALK OF FLAME
From my experience, I bet you wouldn't - Walk of Flame is purely offensive card. Bond is ever seen in purely defensive decks (might as well said that you get press to end combat) since there is lots of actually decent offensive first round damaging strikes, should your goal be to hurt your opponent.I'd play with these and walk of flame if I had more than one
Bond with the Mountain goes in such decks that pack lots of Mirror Walks but don't have big enough vamps to play Obediences in case they do end up in combat.
I own 4 Bonds and never have I combined these two cards in a deck - it was either Thefts + Apportations + an occasional Walk or Mirror walks/Obediences + Rego Motus + Wind Dance/Bond with the Mountain...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
09 Dec 2012 03:57 #42571
by mirddes
Replied by mirddes on topic Re: WALK OF FLAME
why was walk of flame included in third edition tremere!?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
09 Dec 2012 04:23 #42572
by Klaital
For same reason why Bang Nakh has been printed in tons of starters. Because its a Craw Wurm. Big and impressive effect, new players love those.
Replied by Klaital on topic Re: WALK OF FLAME
why was walk of flame included in third edition tremere!?
For same reason why Bang Nakh has been printed in tons of starters. Because its a Craw Wurm. Big and impressive effect, new players love those.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
09 Dec 2012 04:39 - 09 Dec 2012 04:50 #42574
by Boris The Blade
Replied by Boris The Blade on topic Re: WALK OF FLAME
To be fair, big and impressive does work when everyone is playing starters. The !Tremere starter has 5 Apportation to use the Walks, and they scare the !Brujah from pressing.
Walk of flame is not a bad card but there is too much competition for combat slots in
: you already have Magic of the Smith + Ivory Bow to do aggravated, and Theft of Vitae might be the best combat card in the game.
I still like Goratrix + Trap + Walk of Flame, though
Walk of flame is not a bad card but there is too much competition for combat slots in

I still like Goratrix + Trap + Walk of Flame, though

Last edit: 09 Dec 2012 04:50 by Boris The Blade.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Boris The Blade
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1221
- Thank you received: 256
Time to create page: 0.092 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Foro
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Card Balance & Strategy Discussion
- Walk of Flame