Combat as a strategy

elotar wrote:

And from European champion:

How were your preliminary rounds Day 2?
- There was at least one other heavy combat deck in each table...

I also managed to shut down my initial preys really fast with forward rushing and torporizing their first vampires (apart from round 2, when Janne’s Stanislava was Archoned before I even had a turn to act) ....

In all of the rounds I got to the heads up with the other heavy combat deck."



Update: two Tupdog decks in top 6 #facepalm.

Now you are just repeating yourself.

ps. A third Finnish player, ALSO playing Tupdogs, was left outside the final due to coin toss because he had same points as the 8th guy.

elotar wrote:

And from European champion:

How were your preliminary rounds Day 2?
- There was at least one other heavy combat deck in each table...

I also managed to shut down my initial preys really fast with forward rushing and torporizing their first vampires (apart from round 2, when Janne’s Stanislava was Archoned before I even had a turn to act) ....

In all of the rounds I got to the heads up with the other heavy combat deck."



Update: two Tupdog decks in top 6 #facepalm.

What are you trying to tell us with this post ? That the metagame of the day 2 of this year EC was combat heavy ? That Otso was lucky to have the star vampire of his prey archonned in game 2 ? Or that Otso has a good english spelling maybe ?

After looking at resent TWD and tournament reports I got an idea - we should go after Anarch Revolt, as it's the engine of the many stupid combat decks. So to fix it somewhere - make it unique and remove "go anarch" action from the rulebook (the second one has nothing to do with combat, but with the clarity of the game in general).

What is really amazing is that you seems to speak for yourself.

You say the same things over and over again and when someone try to interact with you, you seems to ignore him alltogether. ..

Timo, one has to be a seasoned vekn forum reader to know there is no point arguing with Elotar. The others have to learn the hard way.

When I see real arguments I address them. For personal attacks, fanboyism and stupid things proven wrong years ago I do not bother.