TWD Tension in the Ranks
19 Aug 2014 17:18 #64979
by brandonsantacruz
Be careful when you fight the monsters, lest you become one.
-Friedrich Nietzsche
brandonsantacruz.blogspot.com/
Replied by brandonsantacruz on topic Re: TWD Tension in the Ranks
Pascal, would it be OK for this player to drop this useless graverobbing from his deck to avoid a disqualification?
Be careful when you fight the monsters, lest you become one.
-Friedrich Nietzsche
brandonsantacruz.blogspot.com/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- brandonsantacruz
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Antediluvian
Less
More
- Posts: 1284
- Thank you received: 229
20 Aug 2014 14:26 #64999
by Lönkka
Replied by Lönkka on topic Re: TWD Tension in the Ranks
That's how I would've ruled it if it had been in my tournament.
Or, if I was in a nasty mood, made him keep the Graverobbing and forced him to drop another card. Put most likely not.
Or, if I was in a nasty mood, made him keep the Graverobbing and forced him to drop another card. Put most likely not.
Finnish Politics!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 Aug 2014 14:48 #65001
by Jeff Kuta
When you are anvil, be patient; when a hammer, strike.
pckvtes.wordpress.com
@pckvtes
Replied by Jeff Kuta on topic Re: TWD Tension in the Ranks
I was the head judge. We did not require deck registration as per 6.3 Constructed Deck Registration.
David Corson-Knowles clearly did not play with any intent to gain advantage by having a 91 card deck. It was merely an oversight on his part not having tuned his deck because he hadn't played in years.
The tournament ended without this being known. It was only through David's honesty that he reported the 91 card list for the TWDA. He even mentioned the error in his write-up.
I would not recommend any sanction against him for his mistake.
David Corson-Knowles clearly did not play with any intent to gain advantage by having a 91 card deck. It was merely an oversight on his part not having tuned his deck because he hadn't played in years.
The tournament ended without this being known. It was only through David's honesty that he reported the 91 card list for the TWDA. He even mentioned the error in his write-up.
I would not recommend any sanction against him for his mistake.
When you are anvil, be patient; when a hammer, strike.
pckvtes.wordpress.com
@pckvtes
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
20 Aug 2014 18:57 #65002
by Pascal Bertrand
Regarding this event, Ginés and I decided not to disqualify David.
I, however, highly recommend calling the judge if something is wrong in your deck.
Replied by Pascal Bertrand on topic Re: TWD Tension in the Ranks
I don't know about that - you'll have to check with Vincent, he's in charge of logging decks in the TWDA.Pascal, would it be OK for this player to drop this useless graverobbing from his deck to avoid a disqualification?
Regarding this event, Ginés and I decided not to disqualify David.
I, however, highly recommend calling the judge if something is wrong in your deck.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Pascal Bertrand
- Offline
- Moderator
Less
More
- Posts: 4268
- Thank you received: 1186
21 Aug 2014 06:26 #65005
by Lönkka
Apparently this was noticed only AFTER the tournament:
The card came up in the tournament but I gather it didn't ring any bells at that time:
Often during a tournament I tend to count the cards in my deck while shuffling between the rounds. And before the 1st round. Just to see if the numbers don't match...
Replied by Lönkka on topic Re: TWD Tension in the Ranks
I, however, highly recommend calling the judge if something is wrong in your deck.
Apparently this was noticed only AFTER the tournament:
The tournament ended without this being known. It was only through David's honesty that he reported the 91 card list for the TWDA. He even mentioned the error in his write-up.
The card came up in the tournament but I gather it didn't ring any bells at that time:
Deck notes: Graverobbing was a mistaken inclusion, probably in the same card box from when Anson and a few different Malks were in a previous version of the deck. (I've been playing variations on this "quick Malks & friends" deck since Kalinda came out). Not realizing that there isn't a single level of Dominate in the crypt, I actually drew and held on to Graverobbing for a few turns in Round 2 and considered fishing for a vamp to use it (thankfully I didn't!).
Often during a tournament I tend to count the cards in my deck while shuffling between the rounds. And before the 1st round. Just to see if the numbers don't match...
Finnish Politics!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
21 Aug 2014 11:29 #65007
by Ankha
Replied by Ankha on topic Re: TWD Tension in the Ranks
I feel sorry for David, but the deck won't be included in the TWDA as it's not a legal deck. I can't include the 90-cards version of the deck neither, because it wasn't the deck that was played.I don't know about that - you'll have to check with Vincent, he's in charge of logging decks in the TWDA.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.097 seconds
- You are here:
- Home
- Foro
- V:TES Events
- Event Reports and TWD
- TWD Tension in the Ranks