- Foro
- V:TES Discussion
- Expansion Sets & Card Ideas
- Submission - Server Intrusion (auspex bleed discards cards instead)
Submission - Server Intrusion (auspex bleed discards cards instead)
17 Jan 2013 13:40 - 17 Jan 2013 13:41 #44155
by Boris The Blade
Replied by Boris The Blade on topic Re: Submission - Server Intrusion (auspex bleed discards cards instead)
I like the idea but I am afraid the superior will be a time sink. How about something simpler?
: as above, and the discarded cards are not replaced until the end of the turn.

Last edit: 17 Jan 2013 13:41 by Boris The Blade.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Boris The Blade
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1221
- Thank you received: 256
17 Jan 2013 15:03 #44160
by Franz
Yeah, I like this version better. If they have a jammed hand, you might end up helping then by discarding 1-3 cards, even if you choose which cards to discard.
Replied by Franz on topic Re: Submission - Server Intrusion (auspex bleed discards cards instead)
I like the idea but I am afraid the superior will be a time sink. How about something simpler?
: as above, and the discarded cards are not replaced until the end of the turn.
Yeah, I like this version better. If they have a jammed hand, you might end up helping then by discarding 1-3 cards, even if you choose which cards to discard.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
17 Jan 2013 15:39 - 17 Jan 2013 15:41 #44163
by Reyda
You are playing to much android:netrunner sir...
beside this i don't think the card is really good : it will trump interesting decks with fragile mecanisms and have little impact on already awful ones who rely on same old 2 cards combos.
"I discard 2 carrion crows and 1 aid from bats. oh, you replace with 2 more and an Ashur... ok..."
versus
" I discard your political struggle, your unique copy of Seattle committee and your Libertas". :/
Yes, I already know the stoning is incoming (but you can't say one deck is more interesting blahblah), but I wrote what I had to.
Imagination is our only weapon in the war against reality -Jules de Gaultier
Replied by Reyda on topic Re: Submission - Server Intrusion (auspex bleed discards cards instead)
Name: Server Intrusion
Cardtype: Action modifier
You are playing to much android:netrunner sir...

beside this i don't think the card is really good : it will trump interesting decks with fragile mecanisms and have little impact on already awful ones who rely on same old 2 cards combos.
"I discard 2 carrion crows and 1 aid from bats. oh, you replace with 2 more and an Ashur... ok..."
versus
" I discard your political struggle, your unique copy of Seattle committee and your Libertas". :/
Yes, I already know the stoning is incoming (but you can't say one deck is more interesting blahblah), but I wrote what I had to.

Imagination is our only weapon in the war against reality -Jules de Gaultier
Last edit: 17 Jan 2013 15:41 by Reyda.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 Jan 2013 08:09 #44199
by direwolf
Independent Futurist. Contrarian (titled, X votes where X is the number of votes as the acting minion.) Target Vitals is always the better combat card.
Replied by direwolf on topic Re: Submission - Server Intrusion (auspex bleed discards cards instead)
How about:
"Inception"

Only usable on a successful bleed.
Reduce your bleed by 1. The target Methuselah's hand is reduced by 1 until his or her minion phase.
The target of your bleed does not lose pool. Your prey's hand is reduced by X until his or her minion phase where X is the amount of this vampire's bleed.
"Inception"

Only usable on a successful bleed.






Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
18 Jan 2013 08:21 #44202
by Boris The Blade
Replied by Boris The Blade on topic Re: Submission - Server Intrusion (auspex bleed discards cards instead)
That is terrible: you are just helping you prey cycle his hand.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Boris The Blade
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 1221
- Thank you received: 256
18 Jan 2013 10:12 - 18 Jan 2013 10:13 #44203
by wesile
Hum... haven't noticed the "Up to"...
Yes, that way is a far better option.
Replied by wesile on topic Re: Submission - Server Intrusion (auspex bleed discards cards instead)
Both I guess. But at least my grandprey doesn't lose 6 pool. And discarding is optional ("up to")
Hum... haven't noticed the "Up to"...
Yes, that way is a far better option.
Last edit: 18 Jan 2013 10:13 by wesile.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Foro
- V:TES Discussion
- Expansion Sets & Card Ideas
- Submission - Server Intrusion (auspex bleed discards cards instead)
Time to create page: 0.096 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Foro
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Expansion Sets & Card Ideas
- Submission - Server Intrusion (auspex bleed discards cards instead)