Submission - Planned Offensive
27 Aug 2015 03:21 #72778
by Juggernaut1981




Baron of Sydney, Australia, 418
Submission - Planned Offensive was created by Juggernaut1981
After reading another card, I had this idea for a more Sabbat style card. A higher requirement 'title contest'.
Planned Offensive
Action
1 blood
Requires a Cardinal.
Choose a Prince or Baron controlled by another Methuselah and put this card on an untitled Sabbat vampire or a Bishop you control. The vampire with this card becomes the Archbishop of the city of the chosen Prince or Baron. Younger untitled Sabbat vampires you control may burn blood to pay for contesting this title.
"Did you not realise why we have the Shovelheads? Canon-fodder so we can save our own Vitae." - Melinda Galbraith
Planned Offensive
Action
1 blood
Requires a Cardinal.
Choose a Prince or Baron controlled by another Methuselah and put this card on an untitled Sabbat vampire or a Bishop you control. The vampire with this card becomes the Archbishop of the city of the chosen Prince or Baron. Younger untitled Sabbat vampires you control may burn blood to pay for contesting this title.
"Did you not realise why we have the Shovelheads? Canon-fodder so we can save our own Vitae." - Melinda Galbraith





Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Juggernaut1981
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2376
- Thank you received: 326
27 Aug 2015 06:39 - 27 Aug 2015 06:46 #72784
by jamesatzephyr
Minor wording point: it should require cardinal or regent. It's no change in effect (a regent could play it anyway), but current templating is to say regent anyway.
On the specific card, this seems like a minor variation on Blood Siege , which doesn't see much play - Blood Siege has the relatively harsh action modifiers requirement (which isn't a particular issue for, say, Lasombra Power Structure boon), doesn't cost a blood, can go on any ready Sabbat vampire so you can 'replace' an archbishop with an archbishop etc. The extra flexibility for the Barons isn't a bad thing, but obviously Camarilla is much more popular.
Comparing with the issues I might have over here , that's more flexible, since you can use it even on a table with no titled vampires to steal from. And it gives it to the Ventrue, who probably don't need the help - assuming it works out to be a decent card. Giving Camarilla vote-y decks more tools to consolidate their power is, obviously, potentially quite different from giving similar tech to, say, Barons or Guruhi or whatever.
Replied by jamesatzephyr on topic Re: Submission - Planned Offensive
Planned Offensive
Action
1 blood
Requires a Cardinal.
Choose a Prince or Baron controlled by another Methuselah and put this card on an untitled Sabbat vampire or a Bishop you control. The vampire with this card becomes the Archbishop of the city of the chosen Prince or Baron. Younger untitled Sabbat vampires you control may burn blood to pay for contesting this title.
Minor wording point: it should require cardinal or regent. It's no change in effect (a regent could play it anyway), but current templating is to say regent anyway.
On the specific card, this seems like a minor variation on Blood Siege , which doesn't see much play - Blood Siege has the relatively harsh action modifiers requirement (which isn't a particular issue for, say, Lasombra Power Structure boon), doesn't cost a blood, can go on any ready Sabbat vampire so you can 'replace' an archbishop with an archbishop etc. The extra flexibility for the Barons isn't a bad thing, but obviously Camarilla is much more popular.
Comparing with the issues I might have over here , that's more flexible, since you can use it even on a table with no titled vampires to steal from. And it gives it to the Ventrue, who probably don't need the help - assuming it works out to be a decent card. Giving Camarilla vote-y decks more tools to consolidate their power is, obviously, potentially quite different from giving similar tech to, say, Barons or Guruhi or whatever.
Last edit: 27 Aug 2015 06:46 by jamesatzephyr.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jamesatzephyr
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2788
- Thank you received: 958
Time to create page: 0.076 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Foro
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Expansion Sets & Card Ideas
- Submission - Planned Offensive