Submission:Cedric ADV
01 May 2016 19:15 - 01 May 2016 20:49 #76725
by ReverendRevolver
Submission:Cedric ADV was created by ReverendRevolver
Submission:
Name: Cedric ADV
Gargoyle.

G4
Advanced, independent. +1intercept against D actions.
+1 hand size.
Art notes: less happy looking variant of original.
Need: help to Indy gargoyles.
Cedric is a meh ability for 1 cap too much. Adv makes him a cost appropriate POT FOR support dude for any
deck, especially gargoyles. merged he blocks d actions and may keep untapped for a few.
Name: Cedric ADV

Gargoyle.





G4
Advanced, independent. +1intercept against D actions.


Art notes: less happy looking variant of original.
Need: help to Indy gargoyles.
Cedric is a meh ability for 1 cap too much. Adv makes him a cost appropriate POT FOR support dude for any


Last edit: 01 May 2016 20:49 by ReverendRevolver.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ReverendRevolver
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2436
- Thank you received: 407
01 May 2016 19:59 #76726
by jamesatzephyr
You've removed his Flight at advanced (but it would come back at merged, because both sets of card text apply). While technically possibly, was it intended? Flight has some solid tech for Gargoyles, after all. You could potentially go up to 7 capacity - which is a gap for Gargoyles outside group 2, at the moment.
Replied by jamesatzephyr on topic Submission:Cedric ADV
Submission:
Name: Cedric ADV
Gargoyle.
![]()
![]()
![]()
G4
Advanced, independent. +1intercept against D actions.
+1 hand size.
You've removed his Flight at advanced (but it would come back at merged, because both sets of card text apply). While technically possibly, was it intended? Flight has some solid tech for Gargoyles, after all. You could potentially go up to 7 capacity - which is a gap for Gargoyles outside group 2, at the moment.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jamesatzephyr
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2788
- Thank you received: 958
01 May 2016 20:53 - 01 May 2016 20:54 #76727
by ReverendRevolver
Replied by ReverendRevolver on topic Submission:Cedric ADV
Oversight.
Edited.
And I could argue 7. Up in the air, as its not flat intercept, and flight is probably better than vis some times.
Wanted a solid 6 though, but the obf makes it kind of much I suppose.
Edited.
And I could argue 7. Up in the air, as its not flat intercept, and flight is probably better than vis some times.
Wanted a solid 6 though, but the obf makes it kind of much I suppose.
Last edit: 01 May 2016 20:54 by ReverendRevolver.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ReverendRevolver
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2436
- Thank you received: 407
Time to create page: 0.075 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Foro
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Expansion Sets & Card Ideas
- Submission:Cedric ADV