Optimal seatings changes
26 Feb 2015 15:19 #69505
by Ankha
Replied by Ankha on topic Re: Optimal seatings changes
It's probably not possible.Is it possible to change around seating order in a way that those two that has to sit on same table in all three games would only once be in predator/prey relations?
Because right now the three games goes like this:
game 1: A is prey of B
game 2: B is prey of A
game 3: A is grand prey of B
I think it would be better as:
game 1: A is prey of B
game 2: B is grand prey of A
game 3: A is grand prey of B
...if possible.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
26 Feb 2015 15:56 #69506
by a-e
Marko, Prince of Helsinki
Replied by a-e on topic Re: Optimal seatings changes
This is current optimal seating for 10 player, players 8 and 9 are in same table in all three games.
Round 1
1,2,3,4,5
6,7,8,9,10
Round 2
10,1,9,8,2
5,6,4,3,7
Round 3
4,7,10,3,1
9,2,5,8,6
If on round 2 players 1 and 9 would change places, would it break it?
Round 1
1,2,3,4,5
6,7,8,9,10
Round 2
10,1,9,8,2
5,6,4,3,7
Round 3
4,7,10,3,1
9,2,5,8,6
If on round 2 players 1 and 9 would change places, would it break it?
Marko, Prince of Helsinki
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
27 Feb 2015 12:45 #69531
by Ankha
Replied by Ankha on topic Re: Optimal seatings changes
Just check by yourself: 9 and 10 would be prey/predator on table 1, and predator/prey on table 2.This is current optimal seating for 10 player, players 8 and 9 are in same table in all three games.
Round 1
1,2,3,4,5
6,7,8,9,10
Round 2
10,1,9,8,2
5,6,4,3,7
Round 3
4,7,10,3,1
9,2,5,8,6
If on round 2 players 1 and 9 would change places, would it break it?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
27 Feb 2015 16:17 #69533
by a-e
Yes. But the question is, is it better or worse than what we have now? 8 and 9 being predator/prey on first round, then prey/predator on second, same what 9 and 10 would be, and then predator/grand prey on third round. 8 and 9 would still play three games in same table, but only once next to each other. 9 and 10 would play twice next to each other but they don't share table three times.
Marko, Prince of Helsinki
Replied by a-e on topic Re: Optimal seatings changes
Just check by yourself: 9 and 10 would be prey/predator on table 1, and predator/prey on table 2.This is current optimal seating for 10 player, players 8 and 9 are in same table in all three games.
Round 1
1,2,3,4,5
6,7,8,9,10
Round 2
10,1,9,8,2
5,6,4,3,7
Round 3
4,7,10,3,1
9,2,5,8,6
If on round 2 players 1 and 9 would change places, would it break it?
Yes. But the question is, is it better or worse than what we have now? 8 and 9 being predator/prey on first round, then prey/predator on second, same what 9 and 10 would be, and then predator/grand prey on third round. 8 and 9 would still play three games in same table, but only once next to each other. 9 and 10 would play twice next to each other but they don't share table three times.
Marko, Prince of Helsinki
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
03 Mar 2015 13:50 #69623
by Ankha
Replied by Ankha on topic Re: Optimal seatings changes
Exhaustive search done for 24 players 2R+F, more than a week of computation using distributed computers.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Lönkka
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
14 Sep 2015 13:11 #73117
by Ankha
Replied by Ankha on topic Re: Optimal seatings changes
Seatings are being reevaluated as rule 2 was considered less important than rules 3 and 8.
The following seatings have already been updated:
12, 13, 14, 15, 17.
The following seatings have already been updated:
12, 13, 14, 15, 17.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.106 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Foro
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Generic V:TES Discussion
- Optimal seatings changes