Work-In-Progress preview of the upcoming Anarch-themed set

Ankha wrote:

TwoRazorReign wrote:

Ankha wrote:

Musing on...

1.  +2 bleed, with an additional +1 bleed if this vampire is Toreador.

2.  +2 bleed, or +3 bleed if this vampire is Toreador.

3.  +2 bleed, +3 instead if this vampire is Toreador.

2 is slightly ambiguous because one could think a Toreador could have the choice to play it for +2 bleed only (to avoid an Archon Investigation for instance).

I think 1 and 2 are fine, and I don't find either ambiguous.

2 is ambiguous because "or" can also indicate an alternative.

For instance Virtuosa:
[mel] +1 stealth and +2 bleed, or +2 bleed.

or Angel of Berlin:
Untap an imbued, or equip a ready imbued you control with an equipment from your hand (requirements must be met; pay cost as normal).

Adding an "if" clause is not enough to make it clear that you have no choice when playing the card.

Hmm...that's a good point. 1 is definitely ideal. I just feel like the "if" clause in 2 is restrictive enough.

any news about upcoming set?

alek wrote:

any news about upcoming set?

Round 3 of playtesting in progress. Still need 15 pieces of art, but we've received concept sketches or works-in-progress for all of those. Dropped a card from the set because of playtester feedback. Release likely delayed a week, but we'll see.

Thank you.