-
Foro
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Organizational Questions
-
ECQ organizers playing the tournament
ECQ organizers playing the tournament
09 Feb 2013 22:11 #45092
by KevinM
I think everything should be allowed until its definitively proven that it doesn't work. fr.ex. I'd be upset if I got saddled with a bunch of rules because Random Guy somewhere can't run a qualifier with more than 20 people without completely screwing it up.
Having said that, and as stated elsewhere, I'd like to see the HOW TO QUALIFY section of the 'Continental Championships' page completely and correctly rewritten.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 1186
-
Thank you received: 301
-
-
09 Feb 2013 22:22 #45095
by Adonai
Having said that, and as stated elsewhere, I'd like to see the HOW TO QUALIFY section of the 'Continental Championships' page completely and correctly rewritten.
Can you fix the text and post it here?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 1421
-
Thank you received: 470
-
-
-
-
09 Feb 2013 22:37 #45097
by KevinM
A long time ago, I had a lengthy, well-reasoned discussion with Johannes and Others about getting that text changed/updated and the (minor) problems that the current text was causing, and my suggestions weren't implemented and the page wasn't updated.
At this point, especially given that Hugh said this was taken up at a level that is above my pay grade, I'd rather wait for more information before proceeding.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 1186
-
Thank you received: 301
-
-
Less
More
-
Posts: 351
-
Thank you received: 70
-
-
10 Feb 2013 11:49 #45126
by Squidalot
A long time ago, I had a lengthy, well-reasoned discussion with Johannes and Others about getting that text changed/updated and the (minor) problems that the current text was causing, and my suggestions weren't implemented and the page wasn't updated.
At this point, especially given that Hugh said this was taken up at a level that is above my pay grade, I'd rather wait for more information before proceeding.
it was only taken up at NC level (and it was more more tournament/judge guidelines in totality) - but if you write it and get someone else to sense check it i'm sure it can replace the current wording with a bit of campaigning
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 1586
-
Thank you received: 383
-
-
-
11 Mar 2013 14:50 #45986
by johannes
A long time ago, I had a lengthy, well-reasoned discussion with Johannes and Others about getting that text changed/updated and the (minor) problems that the current text was causing, and my suggestions weren't implemented and the page wasn't updated.
At this point, especially given that Hugh said this was taken up at a level that is above my pay grade, I'd rather wait for more information before proceeding.
it was only taken up at NC level (and it was more more tournament/judge guidelines in totality) - but if you write it and get someone else to sense check it i'm sure it can replace the current wording with a bit of campaigning
If memory servces correctly the resolution we reached was: multi-judge can be applied but then there is no automatic qualifier spot for judge/organizer. I´ll double check the notes and get the text updated accordingly.
The following user(s) said Thank You:
Vlad Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
-
Posts: 812
-
Thank you received: 610
-
-
-
Foro
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Organizational Questions
-
ECQ organizers playing the tournament
Time to create page: 0.106 seconds
