Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
×
Poll: Possible fixes for Pentex Subversion (was ended 0000-00-00 00:00:00)
Total number of voters: 0 | |||
Only registered users can participate to this poll |
25 Jun 2012 15:57 #32509
by AaronC
This is probably another discussion, but since people aren't complaining about how broken Uta Kovacs and Jann Berger are, perhaps the problem isn't Una. Perhaps the problem is 1. Freak Drive, which might need an escalating cost structure, or 2. the fact that the game affords few ways to interact with non-stealth action modifiers outside of Direct Intervention.
Replied by AaronC on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
mattias you clearly have not played enough games against Una , to realise how flawed she is (or specifically the fact that she can act 10+ times in a row on turn 3) that's very hard to counter.
This is probably another discussion, but since people aren't complaining about how broken Uta Kovacs and Jann Berger are, perhaps the problem isn't Una. Perhaps the problem is 1. Freak Drive, which might need an escalating cost structure, or 2. the fact that the game affords few ways to interact with non-stealth action modifiers outside of Direct Intervention.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
25 Jun 2012 16:17 #32511
by Squidalot
Replied by Squidalot on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
quite possibly but I stick to one area at a time hence you can't substantially changed Pentex Subversion without changing something else.
It doesn't just have to be Freak Drive - Cog with friends is quite painful as well.
It doesn't just have to be Freak Drive - Cog with friends is quite painful as well.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
25 Jun 2012 16:19 #32512
by Ohlmann
Replied by Ohlmann on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
For Pentex Subversion, I am very againbst anything that lower its power against bigcap but not against regular vampires. Pentex is the only thing that keep the bigcaps more or less in check anyway.
Now, gicing to player an option to burn the pentex without possible block may be good. For example, spend a discard phase action, 3 pool, and tap the target minion to burn the Pentex Subversion. So, you lose a lot to a pentex without credible support to your star, but if it's early enough you will not be completely dead.
Yes and no. The logic behind Freak Drive is that its cost prevent it being used too often, and it work fine in most decks.
Interacting with non-stealth action modifier and reaction is kind of a slippery slope. You will end being MtG with counterspell and stuff like that.
Now, gicing to player an option to burn the pentex without possible block may be good. For example, spend a discard phase action, 3 pool, and tap the target minion to burn the Pentex Subversion. So, you lose a lot to a pentex without credible support to your star, but if it's early enough you will not be completely dead.
This is probably another discussion, but since people aren't complaining about how broken Uta Kovacs and Jann Berger are, perhaps the problem isn't Una. Perhaps the problem is 1. Freak Drive, which might need an escalating cost structure, or 2. the fact that the game affords few ways to interact with non-stealth action modifiers outside of Direct Intervention.
Yes and no. The logic behind Freak Drive is that its cost prevent it being used too often, and it work fine in most decks.
Interacting with non-stealth action modifier and reaction is kind of a slippery slope. You will end being MtG with counterspell and stuff like that.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
26 Jun 2012 14:23 #32528
by Pullen
Replied by Pullen on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
The best solution is making new cards that counter it, right now I can think of only one card (Shadow of Taint) that can do this. A master card that that burns a card played by anther Methuselah, have it cost a pool. Maybe make it a trifle and it tap's the vampire. You could also have an ally that you could burn to burn a card played by another Methuselah. Their are better options, just need to be creative.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
26 Jun 2012 16:04 #32533
by Squidalot
There's also Sudden, Wash, Bleeding the Vine etc.
I appreciate that none of these are perfect especially if you're playing against a multiple master deck with access to Anthelios/Ashur.
Replied by Squidalot on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
The best solution is making new cards that counter it, right now I can think of only one card (Shadow of Taint) that can do this. A master card that that burns a card played by anther Methuselah, have it cost a pool. Maybe make it a trifle and it tap's the vampire. You could also have an ally that you could burn to burn a card played by another Methuselah. Their are better options, just need to be creative.
There's also Sudden, Wash, Bleeding the Vine etc.
I appreciate that none of these are perfect especially if you're playing against a multiple master deck with access to Anthelios/Ashur.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
26 Jun 2012 16:53 - 26 Jun 2012 16:55 #32534
by Jeff Kuta
When you are anvil, be patient; when a hammer, strike.
pckvtes.wordpress.com
@pckvtes
Replied by Jeff Kuta on topic Re: Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion
Year / TWDs Total / TWDs wPentex / %
1997-2008 / 1076 / 235 / 21.8% (prior to KoT/Ashur Tablets)
2009 / 236 / 111 / 47.0%
2010 / 231 / 130 / 56.2%
2011 / 253 / 144 / 56.9%
2012 / 89 / 62 / 69.7% (reports as of 6/26/2012)
Clearly we are experiencing some kind of trend. Large vampires got better specials and more disciplines in the last few published sets. Ergo, the advantages to playing with superstars grew as did the advantage of playing with the best superstar vampire counter card: Pentex(tm) Subversion.
The card should probably exist, but it *is* problematic, and the problem is getting worse.
1997-2008 / 1076 / 235 / 21.8% (prior to KoT/Ashur Tablets)
2009 / 236 / 111 / 47.0%
2010 / 231 / 130 / 56.2%
2011 / 253 / 144 / 56.9%
2012 / 89 / 62 / 69.7% (reports as of 6/26/2012)
Clearly we are experiencing some kind of trend. Large vampires got better specials and more disciplines in the last few published sets. Ergo, the advantages to playing with superstars grew as did the advantage of playing with the best superstar vampire counter card: Pentex(tm) Subversion.
The card should probably exist, but it *is* problematic, and the problem is getting worse.
When you are anvil, be patient; when a hammer, strike.
pckvtes.wordpress.com
@pckvtes
Last edit: 26 Jun 2012 16:55 by Jeff Kuta.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Reyda
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.119 seconds
- You are here:
- Home
- Foro
- V:TES Discussion
- Polling forum
- Pentex Subversion Poll #2 and Discussion