Contested City Title

Correct answer from TorranceCircle.

The CRR isn't supposed to be an "extended" version of the Rulebook. It's meant to be a summary of detailed points that could be explicited after a first read of the Rulebook.

Pascal wrote:

Correct answer from prestonp.

Preston asked the question, I believe you meant to state that Andrew (TorranceCircle) had the correct answer. Are either (or both) of you going to attend the L.A. Memorial weekend tournaments?

Robert wrote:

Pascal wrote:

Correct answer from prestonp.

Preston asked the question, I believe you meant to state that Andrew (TorranceCircle) had the correct answer. Are either (or both) of you going to attend the L.A. Memorial weekend tournaments?

Ah, yep, I scrolled a bit too fast =)

I won't be attending the LA Memorial tournament.

Once Archbishop and Prince of same city could enter combat with each other. On Crusade cards there usually was a picture of prince getting his ass kicked.

I believe this rule is no more, right guys? It was removed, much like the rule when a vampire calling referendum has to vote for.

galliard wrote:

Once Archbishop and Prince of same city could enter combat with each other. On Crusade cards there usually was a picture of prince getting his ass kicked.

I believe this rule is no more, right guys? It was removed, much like the rule when a vampire calling referendum has to vote for.

Correct, these rules do not apply in V:tES games.

but this "entering combat as an action instead of contesting" rule made sense for a very interesting interaction between players... Instead of just passive blood management. I'd be happy to see it coming back !

maybe we should try it at a special event / storyline tournament ?