Legacy of Pander

We have few players complaining abou two clarifications about a card.

Legacy of Pander, Political Action, Sabbat, R , [Sabbat:R, SW:R]
{Requires a} Sabbat vampire. If this referendum is successful, put this card in play. Each non-titled Pander has 1 vote. Any Sabbat vampire may call a referendum to burn this card as a +1 stealth political action.


LSJ clarification:
groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/wuhgIV-vu2U/WZSUz51u-DAJ

Legacy of Pander [SAB] - Political Action
* Legacy of Pander is cumulative. [LSJ 971118]

VEKN Errata
www.vekn.net/card-lists/77-sw-whats-changed

Legacy of Pander. Gives each non-titled Pander one vote, not one additional vote. (You can have more than one in play, but doing so will still result in each non-titled Pander having one vote. Similar to being named for more than one Rumors of Gehenna - there is no benefit other than needing more actions to remove the bonus).

What is the right rulling?

usually, checking the latest ruling is enough. The one you cite from 1997 is clearly outdated.

but in the case of legacy of pander, just checking the last card text that says explicitely "Each non-titled pander has one vote" is clearly the easiest way to go...

www.secretlibrary.info/index.php?lib=692

Sydnelson wrote:

What is the right rulling?

The 1997 ruling was based on Legacy of Pander's then-current card text ("one additional vote"). The card text was changed in Sabbat War ("one vote"), and the earlier ruling is therefore no longer relevant.


Short version: even if you have 50 Legacy of Pander in play, Basil casts one vote.

OK, thanks for reply. I will show this thread to players.

Correct answers from Reyda and jamesatzephyr.
Legacy of Pander cards don't stack, but it's interesting to have more than 1 in play (in case they burn it).