Malajit Chandramouli moved to a Camarilla vampire

gotcha wrote:

It is even worse in my opinion since it states "Malajit's employer" which would refer to the vampire recruiting the malajit C, right?

Incorrect.

[LSJ 20100512]

LSJ wrote:

On May 11, 10:02 pm, stanles <> wrote:
> Given the wording on Robert Carter differentiating between his
> "employer" and the "vampire with this retainer" if he is moved to
> another vampire via Heidelburg Castle, does Robert Carter "remember"
> who originally took the employ retainer action, and that vampire is
> the one who has to burn the blood ... or is who ever Robert Carter is
> currently on during the untap phase the employer at that time?
The latter.

Robert Carter's card text:

LSJ wrote:

During your untap phase, Carter's employer burns 1 blood, or Carter is burned. The vampire with this retainer gets +2 bleed.

So employer means: "the minion with this retainer". The later use of "vampire with this retainer" prevents an ally getting the +2 bleed when Robert Carter is stolen or transferred to it somehow. (Or a Kiasyd using the Grandest Trick, say.) Of course, when it got to an untap phase and Robert was still on an ally, it'd burn because the ally had no blood to burn.

Klaital wrote:

Yes he can give +1 stealth to whatever minion he is on, only restriction is that he can only be played initially by a non-camarilla vampire, but any minion who he is on can use him once in play. 'employer' refers to whichever minion the retainer is on at the moment.

Correct.