Redistribution and two different Blood Brother players

Ok, great, that's what I thought -- I only recently realized I could do that, I hadn't been using the card to its maximum potential.

PetriWessman wrote:

Ok, great, that's what I thought -- I only recently realized I could do that, I hadn't been using the card to its maximum potential.

You werent using Slake the Redistribution as Giants Blood? And still played BB? Wow, thats ballsy.

You can basically (in this freak scenario) do all sorts of crazy fill up things with slake. My 6 cap redistributes and slakes, my cross tables 6 cap was full but is now empty, but I moved 6 from him to 3 of my guys, shuffled a bit, slaked, and refilled him. Or You can just rob someone else and refill 2 or so of your guys. Or just refill one guy. All kinds of crazy

I think moving one bead around like 13 times still counts as blood gained as well, but may be wrong.

ReverendRevolver wrote:

I think moving one bead around like 13 times still counts as blood gained as well, but may be wrong.

It doesn't. Or, rather, it might, but you don't get to do that.

[LSJ 20100330]

LSJ wrote:

> > 1. Can I move 2 blood from Jerry to Larry, then move the 2 blood back
> > to Jerry and play Slake the Thirst for 2?

No. You get one rearrangement.

So, basically, you look at blood at the start of the rearrangement, then blood at the end of the rearrangement. If you prefer to plan it out and think of it as happening in several steps, just assume that you can only play Slake the Thirst after you're done.

Lönkka wrote:

The set-up (2 of the same circle in same table) is never going to happen though. RIGHT?

It happened yesterday evening in Bologna. Thanks for this clarification

jamesatzephyr wrote:

It's considered acceptable at that point to set fire to the other player, as the apocalypse is probably only moments away.

Just pointing out that New Blood has become something of an anarch convert 2.0 for cycling your crypt, and you can choose its circle. Its not out of realm of possibility that someone picks a "real" circle for it. (I personally always pick Helsinki circle)

Bloodartist wrote:

jamesatzephyr wrote:

It's considered acceptable at that point to set fire to the other player, as the apocalypse is probably only moments away.

Just pointing out that New Blood has become something of an anarch convert 2.0 for cycling your crypt, and you can choose its circle. Its not out of realm of possibility that someone picks a "real" circle for it. (I personally always pick Helsinki circle)

More flames. Bigger flames. Bring kindling.