Banishment confirmation needed on consequences of a ruling from 2000

Dear all,

I would agree confirmation about the consequence of that ruling please:
"A banished vampire will remember all effects that had been applied to him, just as contested vampires do. This includes gained or lost titles. [RTR 20000501]"

If Vampire A commits Diablerie and then it is bannished and then it get back to the ready region during my own turn.
Can my prey (next player in this example) use Calton or Sixth Tradition to burn my vampire?
Is it still immune to Slow Withering until a new Gehenna event is player?

Card Text:
Name: Banishment
Choose a ready younger vampire. Successful referendum means the chosen vampire is moved to the uncontrolled region (breaking any temporary control effects); any cards and counters on the chosen vampire stay with them but are out of play as long as the chosen vampire remains uncontrolled.

Name: Carlton Van Wyk
Cardtype: Ally
(...)During your discard phase, you can burn Carlton to burn a vampire who has committed diablerie since your last turn.

Name: Sixth Tradition: Destruction
Cardtype: Action
+1 stealth action. Requires a ready prince or justicar.
Burn a vampire who has committed diablerie since your last turn.

Name: The Slow Withering
(---) Any vampire who commits diablerie is immune to this effect until the next Gehenna card is played.

Thanks in advance,
Rémi.

Not so weird if you replace banishment with lay low and you use undue influence a

I had an idea for a kind of turbo deck but sadly it doesn't works :'(

Hi,

I was looking for tips to escape from Carlton... any kind of tips.
Anyway, @Timo, do you still have the base decklist of your deck? It looks like a similar idea of mine

Cheers,
Rémi.

Well, waiting a turn after you Lay Low would work, wouldn't it? ☺︎