Impulse for increase bleed

kschaefer wrote:

beslin wrote:

Player A anounce bleed with an action card (example: govern). So bleed for 3.
Player B: no block.
Player A : 3.
Player B remove 3 pool.

If no one played anything to give the impulse back to the acting Methuselah, as in this case, the declared bleed was 3, 3 was taken, the action has reached resolution. If reduction was played, Player A could certainly respond by increasing the bleed.

beslin wrote:

Player A play now action modifier card (lets say Conditioning),so +3 more.

This is illegal. There is no timing window given for this, since they passed on playing the Conditioning when declaring a bleed of 3.

beslin wrote:

Q1: can player A play Conditioning after B remove 3 pool?

No.

beslin wrote:

Q2: if player B all did correct?

Yes.

beslin wrote:

Q3: player B call judge,because A increase bleed after him remove his pool,judge say,is tricky but A can do that,is judge correct?

The judge is absolutely wrong. A's play was illegal.

beslin wrote:

Q4: if A play correct and can do this,if is bleed 3+3,or for 6,i mean if B can now take his pool back and say: bleed is for 6 i can play Archon Investigation?

Moot.

beslin wrote:

Q5: if A play correct can B take 3 pool back and play deflection to redirect bleed for 6?

Moot.

beslin wrote:

Q6: if A correct can B take his 3 pool back and play new card:Visions of Zapathasura (sup:Lock this vampire to reduce a bleed against you to 0.)

Moot.

beslin wrote:

Or maybe A and B dont play everthign correct? can we get official rule for : Impulse for increase bleed?

Explained above when I broke down the initial script.