TWD The Garou Rim Monthly IV: Under Siege, 16.11.2013, Joensuu, Finland

The Garou Rim Monthly IV: Under Siege
16.11.2013
Joensuu, Finland
2R+F
15 Players

vekn.net/event-calendar/event/7378

Winner: Pasi Karjalainen

Deck Name: Four Classy Ladies, a Swede and a Traitor
Author: Pasi Karjalainen
Description: My first Arika deck

Crypt:
3 Arika
3 Marcus Vitel
2 Lucinde Alastor
2 Queen Anne
1 Greger Anderssen
1 Catherine du Bois

Library:
7 Govern the Unaligned
3 Mind Rape

4 Perfect Paragon
3 Elder Impersonation
3 Lost in Crowds
2 Enkil Cog
2 Faceless Night
2 Foreshadowing Destrcuction
2 Spying Mission
2 Swallowed by Night
1 Seduction

5 Villein
5 Zilah's Valley
1 Dreams of the Sphinx
1 Golconda: Inner Peace
1 Information Highway
1 Pentex Subversion

5 Parity Shift
2 Banishment
2 Kine Resources Constested

6 Deflection
5 Obedience
5 Second Tradition: Domain

- - -

So there!

Joensuu's first tournament this season, finally, since we at last got a place to hold them. The youth activity center (or whatever) just in the middle of town was reeeally good for tournaments, and on top of that it's free. So win win win.

The finals went to time, eventually, with Pasi stacking up two VPs, and closing in on a sweep. Others pretty much blew each other up trying to survive, and Pasi waited for a chance to pick the fruits once they were ripe. Hopefully someone else will write something about it.

I won't submit the report just yet, since I need to clarify a couple of things first.

We got one player leave before the second round, and one player arriving only to the second one. Aleksi is DQ'd as appropriate for leaving (too bad that), but did I handle the info correctly? ATM all players are in the Metuselahs section, but I just removed Eetu (late comer) from the first round tables, and did the same with Aleksi. The points seem okay, but the pairings were a bit weird this way (Pasi and Vilma playing both games in 4-player table for example..).

Is this okay or should I tinker around with the override tab or something?

Next Garou Rim issue's in December the 15th, Sunday! Drop by, peeps from around.

Kraus wrote:

Is this okay or should I tinker around with the override tab or something?

Dunno -I'm clueless with special instances and Archon...

It's always nice to see people with good taste and proper deck names.

Played a Nosferatu Royalty (Group 2-3) deck in the finals.

Seating was as follows:

My Nosferatus
Fatima al-Faqadi with Assault Rifle and anarch shenaningans
Tsimizce Wall
Pasi's Arika Deck
Stanislava

Basically, my nossies and the Tsimisce were combating with Fatima all game. Mean while, Pasi crippled Stanislava and then just waited silently to collect two easy VP's.

Kraus wrote:

We got one player leave before the second round, and one player arriving only to the second one. Aleksi is DQ'd as appropriate for leaving (too bad that), but did I handle the info correctly? ATM all players are in the Metuselahs section, but I just removed Eetu (late comer) from the first round tables, and did the same with Aleksi. The points seem okay, but the pairings were a bit weird this way (Pasi and Vilma playing both games in 4-player table for example..).

Is this okay or should I tinker around with the override tab or something?

See "Vekn Archon Rating Guidelines" on the Downloads page here.

! Important: ”DQ FLAG” record labeling
On the Archon, when you put a label in the DQ FLAG record (“Methuselah” sheet), either use the
DQ label or the WD label.
“DQ” stands for disqualification and must be used accordingly. In case a player voluntarily leaves
the tournament, use the "WD" label there:

Thanks guys. Fixed some errors and submitted the Archon.