Nosferatu(-ish) bleed card idea
22 Jun 2012 22:11 #32403
by AaronC
Nosferatu(-ish) bleed card idea was created by AaronC
Unless you play princes or Obfuscate weenies,
and
aren't necessarily the greatest clans. They suffer because they don't have a bleed discipline or a bounce discipline. They don't necessarily have the best clan cards, either, although they are not all bad.
The
should really be a better clan in VTES because of how good they are in the RPG. In the RPG they use Obfuscate and Animalism to gain information by spying in person or sending animal spies, and they then broker that information.
Here is my idea for a card aimed at Nosferatu:
Eyes in the Dark
Action
Bleed at +1 bleed. Gain 1 pool if the bleed is successful.
Bleed at +2 bleed and gain half of any pool successfully burned, rounded down, with a minimum of 1 pool on a successful bleed.
Ousting power and bloat/bleed defense in one package, strongly aimed at the
/
Good flavor as the
uses stolen information to add to his (Methusaleh's) own resources.


The

Here is my idea for a card aimed at Nosferatu:
Eyes in the Dark







Ousting power and bloat/bleed defense in one package, strongly aimed at the



Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
23 Jun 2012 05:10 #32409
by alek
Replied by alek on topic Re: Nosferatu(-ish) bleed card idea
Strong card, I like it a lot. Would need some testing though because it potentially creates strong stealth & bleed deck with very good combat package.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
23 Jun 2012 05:49 #32412
by Juggernaut1981




Baron of Sydney, Australia, 418
Replied by Juggernaut1981 on topic Re: Nosferatu(-ish) bleed card idea
I'd be tempted to create a more Major Boon version of this card. The idea being that you can scout out the information needed to make someone else be the 'fall guy' for the Nosferatu.
Eyes in the Dark
Action

Bleed at +1 bleed. Gain 1 pool if this action is successful.

Choose a Methuselah, put this card into play and this acting vampire may burn 2 blood to untap after resolving this action. When you are successfully bled, you may burn this card to force the Methuselah chosen by this card to burn pool instead of you. Once this card is burned, no action modifiers can be played to increase the bleed. You cannot have more than one copy of this card targeting the same Methuselah.
Eyes in the Dark












Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Juggernaut1981
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2376
- Thank you received: 326
23 Jun 2012 06:34 #32413
by Ohlmann
I am not too trilled by the card. I would usually value Deep song a lot above this card. Also, I would prefer if it had some interesting interaction with the existing bleed tool, like Vermin Channel, Night Move, or Scouting mission.
Replied by Ohlmann on topic Re: Nosferatu(-ish) bleed card idea
Strong card, I like it a lot. Would need some testing though because it potentially creates strong stealth & bleed deck with very good combat package.
I am not too trilled by the card. I would usually value Deep song a lot above this card. Also, I would prefer if it had some interesting interaction with the existing bleed tool, like Vermin Channel, Night Move, or Scouting mission.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
23 Jun 2012 07:14 #32414
by Pendargon
lol. now consider :
Julio Martinez, 9, nec ANI DOM OBF POT
I bleed you with eyes in the dark, with conditioning, at xy stealth. You lose 6 pool i gain 3!
Totally balanced, yes.B-) B-) B-)
Replied by Pendargon on topic Re: Nosferatu(-ish) bleed card idea
Unless you play princes or Obfuscate weenies,
and
aren't necessarily the greatest clans. They suffer because they don't have a bleed discipline or a bounce discipline. They don't necessarily have the best clan cards, either, although they are not all bad.
Theshould really be a better clan in VTES because of how good they are in the RPG. In the RPG they use Obfuscate and Animalism to gain information by spying in person or sending animal spies, and they then broker that information.
Here is my idea for a card aimed at Nosferatu:
Eyes in the Dark
Action
![]()
![]()
Bleed at +1 bleed. Gain 1 pool if the bleed is successful.
![]()
![]()
Bleed at +2 bleed and gain half of any pool successfully burned, rounded down, with a minimum of 1 pool on a successful bleed.
Ousting power and bloat/bleed defense in one package, strongly aimed at the/
Good flavor as the
uses stolen information to add to his (Methusaleh's) own resources.
lol. now consider :
Julio Martinez, 9, nec ANI DOM OBF POT
I bleed you with eyes in the dark, with conditioning, at xy stealth. You lose 6 pool i gain 3!
Totally balanced, yes.B-) B-) B-)







Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
23 Jun 2012 15:16 - 23 Jun 2012 15:20 #32420
by AaronC
So what you're saying is you think that there should be a bleed modifier for
? As I mentioned, the card is meant to address the problems that
have with ousting and bleed defense. Night Moves is not
/
specific, Vermin Channel is only
, and Scouting Mission is a
card, and
is not a
clan discipline.
I'm surprised that you didn't mention Lucian, the Perfect, "lol". There are at most 3 vampires in each grouping with
, and all of them are high capacity (well, Tar Baby is an 8). In comparison, there at most 35 vampires in each grouping who can play Parity Shift at base +1 stealth, which can remove 5 pool from prey and add 5 pool to one's own pool, and some of them have capacities as low as 5 or 6.
Yes, the real issue would come in with the
option, since superior Conditioning pushes the bleed to 6, netting 3 pool instead of 1 or 2. In the groupings, there are the following number of vampires with this combination of disciplines:
1/2: 0
2/3: 1
3/4: 2
4/5: 2
5/6: 1
The card then becomes very good for a few star vampire decks, although their support crypts are rather limited since only vampires with at least
could use Eyes in the Dark. Vampires with
in the groups are as follows:
1/2: 4 (avg cap 7.75)
2/3: 6 (avg cap 8)
3/4: 12 (avg cap 8.2)
4/5: 11 (avg cap 8.6)
5/6: 3 (avg cap 10)
Is a card unbalanced if only a tiny handful of vampires can get a big advantage from it? The answer might be yes, I'm not sure. Lucian would gain 4 pool by combining it with a superior Conditioning by bleeding for 9(!). Of course, is it safe to judge card strength based on Lucian? Again the answer might be yes, but I'm not sure.
My original thought was that superior Eyes in the Dark would be a free Legal Manipulations (+2 bleed, +1 pool) but I was curious about going further with the idea that the Nosferatu also gain a benefit from their spying. Principally I was interested in how it would combo with superior Spying Mission and the +2 bleed/burnt pool you can get with that. Superior Eyes in the Dark requires two more levels of discipline than superior Legal Manipulation. Perhaps:
Bleed at +2 bleed. Gain 1 pool if the bleed is successful and 1 additional pool if the bleed succeeds for more than 1.
It could be that I am the only one who finds non-Prince/Justicar/Beast Nossies uninteresting to play because of their lack of bleed and/or bounce and/or in-built rush.
This experiment really comes from being interested in non-titled high-cap Nossies and trying to see how they could be competitive. It also comes from looking at Feline Saboteur and wondering why that wasn't a bleed card of some type.
Replied by AaronC on topic Re: Nosferatu(-ish) bleed card idea
I am not too trilled by the card. I would usually value Deep song a lot above this card. Also, I would prefer if it had some interesting interaction with the existing bleed tool, like Vermin Channel, Night Move, or Scouting mission.
So what you're saying is you think that there should be a bleed modifier for










lol. now consider :
Julio Martinez, 9, nec ANI DOM OBF POT
I bleed you with eyes in the dark, with conditioning, at xy stealth. You lose 6 pool i gain 3!
Totally balanced, yes.B-) B-) B-)
I'm surprised that you didn't mention Lucian, the Perfect, "lol". There are at most 3 vampires in each grouping with



Yes, the real issue would come in with the



1/2: 0
2/3: 1
3/4: 2
4/5: 2
5/6: 1
The card then becomes very good for a few star vampire decks, although their support crypts are rather limited since only vampires with at least





1/2: 4 (avg cap 7.75)
2/3: 6 (avg cap 8)
3/4: 12 (avg cap 8.2)
4/5: 11 (avg cap 8.6)
5/6: 3 (avg cap 10)
Is a card unbalanced if only a tiny handful of vampires can get a big advantage from it? The answer might be yes, I'm not sure. Lucian would gain 4 pool by combining it with a superior Conditioning by bleeding for 9(!). Of course, is it safe to judge card strength based on Lucian? Again the answer might be yes, but I'm not sure.
My original thought was that superior Eyes in the Dark would be a free Legal Manipulations (+2 bleed, +1 pool) but I was curious about going further with the idea that the Nosferatu also gain a benefit from their spying. Principally I was interested in how it would combo with superior Spying Mission and the +2 bleed/burnt pool you can get with that. Superior Eyes in the Dark requires two more levels of discipline than superior Legal Manipulation. Perhaps:



It could be that I am the only one who finds non-Prince/Justicar/Beast Nossies uninteresting to play because of their lack of bleed and/or bounce and/or in-built rush.
This experiment really comes from being interested in non-titled high-cap Nossies and trying to see how they could be competitive. It also comes from looking at Feline Saboteur and wondering why that wasn't a bleed card of some type.
Last edit: 23 Jun 2012 15:20 by AaronC.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.093 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Expansion Sets & Card Ideas
- Nosferatu(-ish) bleed card idea