Vampire: the Embrace (initiation cards)

alek wrote:

Yeah, I don't want comments about something else than this demoing system.

There were comments about demoing system not about something else. The only difference was amount of changes that was proposed. Looks like you just wanted only comments about cosmetic changes and refused any other bringing wider impact.

Juggernaut1981 wrote:

I think there other ways to simplify the game for new players.

Damnans wrote:

The length of a demo game can be shortened if you only allow one or two learning players in such a game.

Reyda wrote:

If you want to make a v:tes light, use less different cards, and less disciplines.

ReverendRevolver wrote:

i'm somewhat confused, after having milled all of this over. almost every card makes sense to me, except for parity shift. yes, you've turned it into a less confusingly worded card, but its still not as cut and dry as KRC. politics is already a confusing part of the game (possibly the most confusing, since combat is at its core, an attrition module for the game as a whole, and broken into pres, maneuvers, strikes, damage, and press effects) i just wondered if players you've ran this with grasped the parity shift "concept" as easily as other actions.

ReverendRevolver wrote:

and the votes are kind of unbalanced to favor the ventrue, but i think the table balancing with the ventrue deck makes sense, since its an intro to how ventrue can work. are all decks going to have all cards?

ReverendRevolver wrote:

since there is no way to put beads back on minions other than hunting and theft, theft is a really strong card with this.

Zenedar wrote:

I'm liking the idea since getting into vtes without having played any card games before is quite difficult (took a few months for me). Have you considered adding a deflection sort of card? Bouncing bleeds is quite fun for beginners I'd imagine.