Stock Market Manipulation
02 May 2013 09:04 - 02 May 2013 09:04 #48078
by jamesatzephyr
Stock Market Manipulation was created by jamesatzephyr
The suggestion of making Investments into Trifles got me thinking about alternative ways to empower Investments. So, basic idea:
Good for everyone? No, I think a trade-off between card cycling and pool gain is typically not going to be a no-brainer. But for a deck that lacks blood gain (for Villein, Doll etc.), would this give you slightly better pool gain options? (That, of course, could include Imbued.)
Does it need some sort of exhaustion clause?
Does using a discard phase action cost too much that you wouldn't consider playing it? Could it just move a counter once per turn for free, or would that be too much? (The tier 1 VoterCap/Villein deck is probably still playing a clutch of Villeins and not this, right?)
Anyway, have at it.
Stock Market Manipulation
Event. Government.
Once per turn, a Methuselah can spend a discard phase action to move a blood counter from an Investment they control to their pool.
Event. Government.
Once per turn, a Methuselah can spend a discard phase action to move a blood counter from an Investment they control to their pool.
Good for everyone? No, I think a trade-off between card cycling and pool gain is typically not going to be a no-brainer. But for a deck that lacks blood gain (for Villein, Doll etc.), would this give you slightly better pool gain options? (That, of course, could include Imbued.)
Does it need some sort of exhaustion clause?
Stock Market Manipulation
Event. Government.
Put this card in play with X broker counters on it, where X is the number of Methuselahs currently in the game. Once per turn, a Methuselah can spend a discard phase action to move a blood counter from an Investment they control to their pool. Whenever an Investment is burned, burn a broker counter from this card. Burn this card if it has zero broker counters.
Event. Government.
Put this card in play with X broker counters on it, where X is the number of Methuselahs currently in the game. Once per turn, a Methuselah can spend a discard phase action to move a blood counter from an Investment they control to their pool. Whenever an Investment is burned, burn a broker counter from this card. Burn this card if it has zero broker counters.
Does using a discard phase action cost too much that you wouldn't consider playing it? Could it just move a counter once per turn for free, or would that be too much? (The tier 1 VoterCap/Villein deck is probably still playing a clutch of Villeins and not this, right?)
Anyway, have at it.
Last edit: 02 May 2013 09:04 by jamesatzephyr.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jamesatzephyr
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2788
- Thank you received: 958
02 May 2013 09:57 #48080
by Ohlmann
Replied by Ohlmann on topic Re: Stock Market Manipulation
The exhaustion clause seem useless to me, because emptying completely more investment than the number of player (i.e., at the very least two) just seem unlikely.
Power-level wise, even the first version don't seem outrageous to me, because discard phase action are even harder than master phase to come by ; gaining one or two pool per turn ain't all that useful, and unlike villein it's slow and predictible, even if you were able to get the same amount of pool with both.
The card, however, would make any additional way to get discard phase a lot more powerful than intended, since there is a critical mass of discard phase action which make this card pass from "meh" to "overpowered".
Power-level wise, even the first version don't seem outrageous to me, because discard phase action are even harder than master phase to come by ; gaining one or two pool per turn ain't all that useful, and unlike villein it's slow and predictible, even if you were able to get the same amount of pool with both.
The card, however, would make any additional way to get discard phase a lot more powerful than intended, since there is a critical mass of discard phase action which make this card pass from "meh" to "overpowered".
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
02 May 2013 10:43 - 02 May 2013 10:44 #48081
by Ankha
Replied by Ankha on topic Re: Stock Market Manipulation
Wouldn't be spending influence better? Say 2 influence to get back 1 pool (once per turn).
A DPA is costly all game long. Using influence would prevent from transfering back 2 pool and gaining 1 pool from an investement.
That being said, the Stock Market Manipulation you proposed shouldn't have an "exhaustion" clause.
A DPA is costly all game long. Using influence would prevent from transfering back 2 pool and gaining 1 pool from an investement.
That being said, the Stock Market Manipulation you proposed shouldn't have an "exhaustion" clause.
Last edit: 02 May 2013 10:44 by Ankha.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
02 May 2013 11:28 - 02 May 2013 11:30 #48085
by jamesatzephyr
Mmm... interesting. Would you limit its usage, or just as many as you can afford per turn? In the mid-to-late game, Ingrid Rossler + SMM would turn Short-Term into not quite "Gain 2 pool". Ventrue Investment is very likely "Gain 2 pool", and Ingrid/Info highway can improve that. I'm not sure any of that's a problem, just thinking out loud.
Mapatano Utando would be interesting in that context, too.
You could Secret Horde to get in range of a Parity Shift, and then fairly rapidly bring the SH pool back. That might be more annoying but, again, thinking out loud.
Replied by jamesatzephyr on topic Re: Stock Market Manipulation
Wouldn't be spending influence better? Say 2 influence to get back 1 pool (once per turn).
Mmm... interesting. Would you limit its usage, or just as many as you can afford per turn? In the mid-to-late game, Ingrid Rossler + SMM would turn Short-Term into not quite "Gain 2 pool". Ventrue Investment is very likely "Gain 2 pool", and Ingrid/Info highway can improve that. I'm not sure any of that's a problem, just thinking out loud.
Mapatano Utando would be interesting in that context, too.
You could Secret Horde to get in range of a Parity Shift, and then fairly rapidly bring the SH pool back. That might be more annoying but, again, thinking out loud.
Last edit: 02 May 2013 11:30 by jamesatzephyr.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jamesatzephyr
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2788
- Thank you received: 958
02 May 2013 12:18 #48087
by Ohlmann
Replied by Ohlmann on topic Re: Stock Market Manipulation
Since the proposition is once per turn, Secret Horde won't be all that quick. At best 2 pool per turn, one for the master phase, one for 2 transfer.
Without the once per turn clause, it can lead to insanely fast pool gain.
Without the once per turn clause, it can lead to insanely fast pool gain.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
02 May 2013 14:27 #48088
by Ankha
On the other hand, if we keep your idea (using a DPA to transfer 1), then unlimiting it may not be an issue (DPA being more expensive than transfers).
Replied by Ankha on topic Re: Stock Market Manipulation
I would limit it, otherwise you could gain 3 pool per turn (1 for a MPA, 2 for 4 transfers) with no other requirement almost for free.
Wouldn't be spending influence better? Say 2 influence to get back 1 pool (once per turn).
Mmm... interesting. Would you limit its usage, or just as many as you can afford per turn?
On the other hand, if we keep your idea (using a DPA to transfer 1), then unlimiting it may not be an issue (DPA being more expensive than transfers).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.109 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Expansion Sets & Card Ideas
- Stock Market Manipulation