Submission: Ars Magna
07 May 2018 16:48 #86564
by kschaefer
Replied by kschaefer on topic Submission: Ars Magna
This is better than Jack of Both Sides (sometimes). Would this need to exist if Jack of Both Sides provided an unlock if successful?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
07 May 2018 17:52 #86566
by LivesByProxy
Jack of Both Sides still would not make melee weapon combat any better. Melee weapons would still be weak at close range (weak damage bonus and you're still getting hit by the opponent) and useless at long range.
Gangrel. Noddist. Camarilla. Once each turn, LivesByProxy may burn 1 blood to lose Protean
until the end of the turn and gain your choice of superior Auspex
, Obfuscate
, or Potence
for the current action.
Replied by LivesByProxy on topic Submission: Ars Magna
This is better than Jack of Both Sides (sometimes). Would this need to exist if Jack of Both Sides provided an unlock if successful?
Jack of Both Sides still would not make melee weapon combat any better. Melee weapons would still be weak at close range (weak damage bonus and you're still getting hit by the opponent) and useless at long range.









Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- LivesByProxy
-
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
- Malfeasant Entity
Less
More
- Posts: 518
- Thank you received: 76
07 May 2018 18:01 #86567
by kschaefer
Replied by kschaefer on topic Submission: Ars Magna
Except this has many of the same facets of a card that already exists. If you want to make melee combat better, make melee combat better. If you want to protect your resource from being blocked, make it cheaper, etc. there's already a card for that. Jack of Both sides doesn't see a lot of play because retainers are not expensive (for the most part) so the cost reduction is useless. For equipment, Concealed Weapon is better for any weapon. For non-weapon equipment, it's not an equip action so effects that aid the minion after equip actions don't work. Simply that card could be made better to get the weapons into play. The combat should just be something else.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
07 May 2018 18:07 - 07 May 2018 18:16 #86568
by Bloodartist
Which is why the card needs to have a pretty strong effect in combat in addition to giving a 'free' equip. This is still vulnerable to so many things, the payoff needs to be worth it when it actually does work.This is the important part.
The free equip is there so the card is not just inferior to concealed weapon. (and by free quip I mean that it doesnt 'cost' an action to equip)
A heretic is a man who sees with his own eyes.
—Gotthold Ephraim Lessing
Replied by Bloodartist on topic Submission: Ars Magna
This is better than Jack of Both Sides (sometimes). Would this need to exist if Jack of Both Sides provided an unlock if successful?
Which is why the card needs to have a pretty strong effect in combat in addition to giving a 'free' equip. This is still vulnerable to so many things, the payoff needs to be worth it when it actually does work.This is the important part.
The free equip is there so the card is not just inferior to concealed weapon. (and by free quip I mean that it doesnt 'cost' an action to equip)
A heretic is a man who sees with his own eyes.
—Gotthold Ephraim Lessing
Last edit: 07 May 2018 18:16 by Bloodartist.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bloodartist
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Antediluvian
-
Less
More
- Posts: 968
- Thank you received: 166
08 May 2018 08:35 #86589
by Lönkka
Exactly!
X additionals is, erm, rather ridiculous.
Plus the action is at +2 Stealth, it doesn't cost a thing and it untaps.
Gonna have to say that too cheesy for my tastes.
But props for trying to boost melee weapons though!
Replied by Lönkka on topic Submission: Ars Magna
Going with the "almost" anything to make melee weapons better, this is just slightly beyond the "almost".
Exactly!
X additionals is, erm, rather ridiculous.
Plus the action is at +2 Stealth, it doesn't cost a thing and it untaps.
Gonna have to say that too cheesy for my tastes.
But props for trying to boost melee weapons though!
Finnish
Politics!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
08 May 2018 08:54 #86591
by Kraus
"Oh, to the Hades with the manners! He's a complete bastard, and calling him that insults bastards everywhere!"
-Nalia De-Arnise
garourimgazette.wordpress.com/
www.vekn.net/forum-guidelines
Replied by Kraus on topic Submission: Ars Magna
+2 Stealth is fine, Unlock is fine, all that jazz is fine and I really kind of enjoy the mechanics here. I mean, you're not using this to equip with a Helicopter, which would be bad, but only use it for melee weapons.
It's the end result of the power level you're suggesting that troubles me. This card doesn't enable melee weapons - melee weapons enable this. You'll need a random weapon, whatever basically, to be able to dish out a stupid amount of damage from the board (not one-off from hand, mind you), and Ars Magna doesn't care what you're using as it's fodder.
This card is better than the cards it's supposed to help. That is the problem for me here.
It's the end result of the power level you're suggesting that troubles me. This card doesn't enable melee weapons - melee weapons enable this. You'll need a random weapon, whatever basically, to be able to dish out a stupid amount of damage from the board (not one-off from hand, mind you), and Ars Magna doesn't care what you're using as it's fodder.
This card is better than the cards it's supposed to help. That is the problem for me here.
"Oh, to the Hades with the manners! He's a complete bastard, and calling him that insults bastards everywhere!"
-Nalia De-Arnise
garourimgazette.wordpress.com/
www.vekn.net/forum-guidelines
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.107 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Expansion Sets & Card Ideas
- Submission: Ars Magna