Danse Macabre feedback survey - Alpha version

after corrections i will prepare online version
now it is time to propose other questions, delete questions, etc

or help me to correct my poor english.... (thanks Ankha)

I don't understand question 1.5.
For 1.3 description is not clear.It is to general. What do you mean? power level, quality of card text description (it's clear, doesn't need clarifications), balance, freshness (bringing new ideas instead of copying old effects), staying close to WoD, etc.

How are Technical and Mechanics different for 1.5 and 1.3?

For question 2, I'd ask in a different way:

Broad Power Card (Must have in every deck)
Specific Power Card (Must have in specific decks)
Broad Useful Card (Will often see play in most of my decks)
Specific Useful Card (Will often see play in specific decks)
Corner Case Card (Will occasionally see play in unusual situations)
I will never play this card.
{And then have a question if they check the last one "Why would you never play this card?}

alek wrote:

could you create online version of the survey?

He is.
This is just the preliminary one to iron out all the problems beforehand.
You know, for proofreading and stuff...

Ankha wrote:

My corrections
This is ALPHA Version of the survey.
Please provide your comments and ideas regarding this survey.

---

Danse Macabre feedback survey

By answering this survey you are helping us to create even better expansion sets in the future….


1 GENERAL QUESTIONS REGARDING EXTENSION.

1.1 Have you included and played withDanse Macabre cards in your decks?
I've played with the new cards and I'm willing to to provide general and detailed feedback.
I've played with the new cards and I'm willing to to provide general feedback.
I've played with the new card but do not feel competent to provide feedback or don't want to.
I've played with the new cards.
Other answer…………..
No answer.

Not sure what "I've played with th new cards" should refer to (as there's already a section for "played + feedback" and "played + no feedback").
"I haven't played with the new cards." would be more relevent.
Or "I haven't included any Danse Macabre cards in my deck, but I've seen them played by my opponents [and {would like to / don't feel like giving} feedback over them]"

Ankha wrote:

1.2 Are you planning to use Danse Macabre cards in near future ?
Yes
No
Other answer…….
No answer

Ankha wrote:

If 1.2 No
What is the reason you are not planning to use Danse Macabre cards in near future
- I don’t have time to play at all
- I don’t like this expansion set
- I don’t like the expansion set publishing format(self printing)

Ankha wrote:

If you feel competent and are willing to provide general feedback, please give your opinion on the following:

Ankha wrote:

1.3 How do you feel about the mechanics used by the new cards (balance, complexity...)
Very good
Good
Avarage
Bad
Very Bad
Other answer…………..
No answer

Now, that's going to be a tricky question. What should people do if they think one card is overpowered, and another one is complete rubbish?
You're going to have lots of "other answers" for this.

Ankha wrote:

1.4 How do you feel about the art used on the nex cards?
Very good
Good
Avarage
Bad
Very Bad
Other answer…………..
No answer

Ankha wrote:

1.5 Technical level of card publication ???
Very good
Good
Avarage
Bad
Very Bad
Other answer…………..
No answer

Same as Vincent - I don't understand this question. Can you rephrase?

Ankha wrote:

2 Give us a detailed opinion about each card (you may skip cards you don't feel competent about or you don't want to comment)

For each card, what is your feeling?
It's a very good card
It's a good card
It's an average card
It's a week card
It's wallpaper

I STRONGLY recommend NOT using "competent", since you never defined what it requires to be competent in giving opinions. Scrap all occurrences.
"Please give us your opinion on the cards you wish to comment - you don't have to comment everything.