Mehemet ruling outdated?
29 Sep 2011 09:41 #11133
by drnlmza
--
National Coordinator
South Africa
Mehemet ruling outdated? was created by drnlmza
Currently, the list of rulings has the following for Mehemet of the Ahl-i-Batin:
The rulebook, however, says:
which would make Mehemet's action directed at both the controller of the discipline card and the vampire targeted, rather than undirected.
I assume this discrepancy is merely because of the age of the ruling, and it's no longer valid. That correct?
If the Discipline card is controlled by a Methuselah other than the controller of the vampire it is on, Mehemet's action to burn it and a blood from the vampire is undirected. [LSJ 20010816]
The rulebook, however, says:
If the action targets one or more other Methuselahs (or things controlled by other Methuselahs), then the action is called directed, and only the Methuselahs who are targeted (or control the targets) may use their ready untapped minions to attempt to block the action
which would make Mehemet's action directed at both the controller of the discipline card and the vampire targeted, rather than undirected.
I assume this discrepancy is merely because of the age of the ruling, and it's no longer valid. That correct?
--
National Coordinator
South Africa
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
29 Sep 2011 11:35 #11137
by Pascal Bertrand
Replied by Pascal Bertrand on topic Re: Mehemet ruling outdated?
Correct. The ruling doesn't apply anymore. I'll remove it from that list. Thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Pascal Bertrand
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4268
- Thank you received: 1186
Time to create page: 0.069 seconds
- You are here:
-
Home
-
Forum
-
V:TES Discussion
-
Rules Questions
- Mehemet ruling outdated?