Re: Damage immunity

Greets!

My vamp is immune to non-aggravated damage. Does the non-aggra damage inflicted to her count "successfully inflicted" or not?

My guess it does, because it isn't reduced or prevented only my vamp ignores its effects (like Deep Song against Gotsdam - successful action with no effect), but correct me if I'm wrong.

Not succesfuly inflicted.
damage prevented and/or damage that are reduced to 0, inflict no damage.

Reyda wrote:

Not succesfuly inflicted.
damage prevented and/or damage that are reduced to 0, inflict no damage.

Correct.

Reyda wrote:

Not succesfuly inflicted.
damage prevented and/or damage that are reduced to 0, inflict no damage.

But where is it written that Immunity to damage does either of those? I haven't found it anywhere on the site.

Seems like we're on a trend for these questions....it's certainly not in the rulebook so here it is relying on the usual English sense of Immunity. .

Non-existant user wrote:

Reyda wrote:

Not succesfuly inflicted.
damage prevented and/or damage that are reduced to 0, inflict no damage.

But where is it written that Immunity to damage does either of those? I haven't found it anywhere on the site.

As many card games, Vtes is based on two things:
- words that people know from common usage
- "keywords" (that might also be used in common usage, but mostly with a different meaning).

"Immune" is of the first category. Other examples: "card", "next", "attempt", ...

"Vampire", "maneuver", "strike", "pool", "aggravated", "equipment", "recruit", "Prince", .. are of the second category).

If you think "immune" should be explicitely in the second category, please let me know.