file Change of Target + NRA

12 Nov 2012 21:37 - 12 Nov 2012 21:37 #40834 by Pascal Bertrand

@Pascal:
Others have attempted to find a more recent than 2001 ruling by LSJ. It seems to imply that CoT will remove the NRA taint.

Does Change of Target "wash off taint" for the purposes of the No Repeat Actions rule. Such as:

Minion A declares a Bleed action. Minion B attempts to block. Minion A plays Change of Target.

Can Minion A now declare another bleed action (with a different name to the previous bleed action)?

No. The action is blocked (per Change of Target's text), thus the NRA kicks in.

You can't play another base Govern the Unaligned, nor can't you play a Computer Hacking, if you somehow untap.

Please give a reference to LSJ's link regarding Change of Target not tainting the action with NRA.
In [LSJ 20010512] , "the action kicks in if it is successful" should be read as "applying the terms of an action kicks in if it is successful".

Blocked actions trigger NRA (it wasn't the case back in Jyhad-times, but it is now, and it has been for more than 10 years).

Tangle Atropo's Hand cancels the action before resolution ("when a minion attempts to block"), which means we didn't reach resolution, and that the same minion can attempt the same action this turn.
Last edit: 12 Nov 2012 21:37 by Pascal Bertrand.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Juggernaut1981, Robba Yaga

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 Nov 2012 22:25 #40837 by Juggernaut1981

No. The action is blocked (per Change of Target's text), thus the NRA kicks in.

Blocked actions trigger NRA (it wasn't the case back in Jyhad-times, but it is now, and it has been for more than 10 years).

Tangle Atropo's Hand cancels the action before resolution ("when a minion attempts to block"), which means we didn't reach resolution, and that the same minion can attempt the same action this turn.

A nice clean principle that can be used in the future. I like this sort of ruling-statement.

:bruj::CEL::POT::PRE::tha: Baron of Sydney, Australia, 418

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 Nov 2012 10:42 #40865 by drnlmza
Replied by drnlmza on topic Re: Change of Target + NRA

@Pascal:
Others have attempted to find a more recent than 2001 ruling by LSJ. It seems to imply that CoT will remove the NRA taint.


There are a number of later discussions on the interaction between CoT and NRA clear. See for example this one from 2009 caused by our play goup getting CoT horribly wrong.

--
National Coordinator
South Africa

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Moderators: AnkhaKraus
Time to create page: 0.077 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum