Sowing Dissension

Just to make sure: Sowing Dissention is still considered to be an undirected action, right?

PetriWessman wrote:

Just to make sure: Sowing Dissention is still considered to be an undirected action, right?

Not any more, since 08/08/08.
groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad/1jW6GXrIRSU/8QTYL98kB0gJ

Some actions target more than one thing, some without the ability to
individually control the selection, like Edged Illusion or Jaroslav Pascek's
special ability. If one or more of the targets cannot be targeted (because of
Trophy: Safe Passage, Sleep Unseen, or Reality, for example), the action can
still be taken, and it will simply have no effect on the things it cannot target
(and have the normal effect on the allowable targets).

Each of the actual targets is considered a target, which means that effects like
Hide's "the action fails" or Talley's "+1 intercept" can be used if any one (or
more) of the targets would be enough to enable the effect.

If one of the multiple targets becomes ineligible during the course of the
action, then it's handled just as if it had always been ineligible. The action
resolves on the remaining targets as above.

Sowing Dissension is a action against all (other) Methuselahs

Ok, thanks. Bah, there goes one great idea...