Card replacement and Phase skip.

Name: Mirror Walk
[Third:C, KoT:C, SP:PwN6, V5:PTr6]
Cardtype: Action Modifier
Discipline: Thaumaturgy
Do not replace until your discard phase.
[tha] +1 stealth.
[THA] As above, and if this action is blocked, lock the blocking minion and end the action before block resolution.
Artist: Brian LeBlanc

Name: Enkil Cog
[KoT:R, Anthology:1, 25th:1]
Cardtype: Action Modifier
Unique. Requires a vampire with capacity 10 or more. Only usable after resolution of a successful bleed against your prey.
Put this card on this vampire. This vampire gets +1 bleed. During any Methuselah's minion phase, this vampire can lock this card to take an action.
Artist: Marian Churchland; Ginés Quiñonero; Marian Churchland

114. Procedural Error - Misrepresentation

Definition:

A player is considered to have committed this infraction when he or she unintentionally misplayed a card or a game rule.

Example:

(A) A player attempts to play Dread Gaze on a referendum that one of his vampires called.

(B) A player attempts to play Frenzy during his own turn.

(C) A player plays Art Museum when she doesn't have any ready Toreador.

Philosophy:

This penalty assumes an unintentional action on behalf of the player. If the judge believes the misrepresentation was intentional, see section 160 - Cheating.

Penalty:

Caution.

121. Card Drawing - Drawing Extra Cards

Definition:

Players are not considered to have drawn extra cards when they place a card face down on the table (without looking at the card) in an effort to accurately count out cards as they draw. This penalty should be applied only once to one or more cards if they are drawn in the same action or sequence of actions, at the judge's discretion.

Philosophy:

Any time players draw extra cards, there is always a chance they will go unnoticed by their opponent, potentially giving them a significant advantage. Because of this potential for abuse, the penalty for drawing extra cards is fairly severe. A player can accidentally look at extra cards very easily, so a separate, less severe penalty is established for that infraction called Looking at Extra Cards (section 122).

Correcting the problem always involves putting the extra card (if known, or a random card from the player's hand if not known) back in the deck and reshuffling the deck, unless some other player has, through the course of the game, gained a knowledge of some portion of the player's deck, in which case the card should simply be returned to the top of the deck without shuffling. This ensures that the game will be impacted as little as possible.

Improper Drawing at Start of Game (section 123) is also a separate, less severe penalty.

Penalty:

Warning. For the game to continue, the situation should always be corrected. When it is obvious which extra card was drawn, the card should be placed back in the deck. If it is unclear which card is the "extra" card, a random card should be selected from a player's hand. The opponents of the player committing the infraction should be allowed to see any cards the other player has seen due to this infraction.

An automatic game loss should be applied if a player has drawn so many cards that a judge is unable to correct the situation.

200. Correction of Game State

This section generally deals with returning the game to a fair and playable state after certain types of infractions. Only the judge may make corrections to the game state. Correction of the game state is done in addition to and not instead of the application of the appropriate penalty for the infraction.

Philosophy:

It is important that the player committing the infraction receive no benefit in the game for doing so. If no significant game actions have taken place, play should be backed-up to the point of the error. The error should then be corrected and the game should proceed forward from that point. If significant game actions have taken place (such as having too many cards played and/or replaced), the judge may choose to leave the game undisturbed or may adjust the game state in some other way (for instance, altering pool or blood levels) since players have made play decisions based on the subsequent state of the game.

Examples:

(A) During his master phase, a player realizes he did not make the decision to pay for a contested card.;

Resolution: In this case, very little has transpired since the error was made. The player backs up to his untap phase, chooses to pay or give up the contest, then continues his turn. Once the turn continues he may choose to make the same or different plays continuing forward from this point. 

...

164. Cheating - Collusion

Definition:

Players agree to alter, predetermine, or otherwise illegally establish the results of a game.

Examples:

A player agrees to let his friend oust him without offering resistance in order to improve the friend's standings in the event.

With two players remaining, each agree to flip a coin to determine which player will concede the game.

Philosophy:

Players participating in standard table talk or in-game agreements should not be considered in violation of this rule as long as they meet the following criteria:

    No player introduces incentives outside the current game such as cash, cards, or other items.
    No part of the agreement has been secret or has taken place outside of the current game.
    No part of the agreement involves a random selection of the winner.
    The agreement does not otherwise violate section 5.2 of the V:EKN Tournament Rules.

Penalty:

Disqualification without Prize.