file Break the Bonds presence target

04 Jul 2024 23:24 #111924 by Oracle.kid
Unless we are reading a different ruling, it is not the same comparison.

LSJ's (still valid) ruling is about a bleed action with an optional effect depending on something that is not known upon declaration (the bleed amount vs the cost of the ally). It is not relevant in the case of Break the Bonds which is a bleed action but with a mandatory effect that is well defined.

If you want to use the pre effect of Break the Bond, you need to choose a vampire in your uncontrolled region when declaring the action (so you cannot use the pre effect if you don't have any vampire in it).


The question is for BtB: Value = bleed successful, so it is always triggered in the same way. No matter how much the bleed is. Therefore, you can define which minion at action announcement.

Syntax would read if X, then Y.

For Keystone Kine: Value = bleed successful with an amount X. Since X is unknown until action resolution, a target cannot be named beforehand.

Syntax would read if X, then Y for N.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Jul 2024 20:39 - 06 Jul 2024 20:40 #111945 by Ankha

the general interpretation of the Keystone Kine ruling was thought to be based on the conditional nature of the effect ("if y, x") making it not know if it (x) would happen and therefore didn´t require the declaration of the target in the announcement and would only need to be done when and if the qualifier (y) was met... which is why this ruling in KRCG is currently also linked to eg. The Platinum Protocol


1. Since KK is an action, the " If this action is successful," part is in fact optional but put the emphasis on the fact that something depending on the outcome of the action must be decided when the action resolves. However, since that some something depends on the final bleed amount, it is implied that the outcome must be known before making that decision.

2. BtB depends on the bleed being successful, which is different from KK, but it doesn't matter for determining whether the target(s) must be declared or not. Since the [obf] effect depends on the outcome as it relies on the final target of the bleed, the minion being locked cannot be chosen before resolution. But the [pre] effect doesn't, so you can and must choose the target when announcing the action.

3. PP is an action modifier, depending on the bleed being successful and the final target of the bleed.

now your provided ruling (assumingly based on the same ruling) states that it is because of the unknown details of the bleed value that matters for the targeting of the conditional effect why the target declaration is delayed for it... which means it has nothing to do with conditional effects and their unknown nature of whether they will happen or not.

one would need to know about this ruling to come to the right conclusion and it is difficult to generally apply it as the argument could be made that the conditional effects all have an unknown aspect to them but this unknown fact doesn't matter only unknown aspects that affect the targeting do.

The rule is: make all the possible choices when announcing the action. Choices that depend on the outcome of the action must be made during resolution.

Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
Last edit: 06 Jul 2024 20:40 by Ankha.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Jul 2024 20:45 #111946 by Ankha

OK, going to leave the editorial complaining out and skip straight to questions.

1) You need an uncontrolled minion to announce the :pre: line on Break the Bonds (ruled in this thread). You don't necessarily choose the minion at that time as Undue Influence's explicit text requires, one just has to be there for announcement.

QUESTION: Do you defer selection of the recipient until after the bleed is successful?

No, it can and must be chosen when announcing the action.

That's what the Keystone Kine precedent would suggest - the target of "if successful" lines are selected only after the bleed demonstrates success. That 2-part timing feels clumsy.

It's suggesting something, but it's not required.

There's also that Platinum Protocol question hanging. The :pro: line is mandatory and should have a valid target on announcement if you follow the :pre: Break the Bonds ruling here.

The recipient cannot be chosen as long as the final target of the bleed is not known.

QUESTION: Is a valid INITIAL target for every MANDATORY effect required even when there's a "if successful" that implies deferred selection of the actual target?

"Initial" implies it may change. So no, you don't choose it until the resolution.

Prince of Paris, France
Ratings Coordinator, Rules Director
The following user(s) said Thank You: TryDeflectingThisGrapple

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 Nov 2024 11:25 #113126 by Coyote
Sorry to resurrect this, but one point is unclear to me.

My understanding is that when you declare an action with Keystone Kine using [obfuscate] you don't have to choose a target until after you've performed the bleed. That is clear.

But if your predator has no allies in play, you can declare to use the obfuscate discipline?

If this is true in case there are other similar effects this rule would be correct?

If an effect of an action can't be fully defined until resolution, that action can be declared, even there are no suitable targets for the action at that moment. (the phase for selection of targets is postponed) If at resolution there is still no target available, the effect will fizzle.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
19 Nov 2024 12:31 #113129 by acbishop

Sorry to resurrect this, but one point is unclear to me.

My understanding is that when you declare an action with Keystone Kine using [obfuscate] you don't have to choose a target until after you've performed the bleed. That is clear.

But if your predator has no allies in play, you can declare to use the obfuscate discipline?

If this is true in case there are other similar effects this rule would be correct?

If an effect of an action can't be fully defined until resolution, that action can be declared, even there are no suitable targets for the action at that moment. (the phase for selection of targets is postponed) If at resolution there is still no target available, the effect will fizzle.



you announce the discipline you use when you declare the action, then in resoluaiton you check if there is any ally you can burn to fulfil the obf part


"If this action is successful, you can burn an ally controlled by your prey whose cost is not greater than the bleed amount." - if there is no ally to burn then you don't burn anything

:vtes:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Nov 2024 09:01 #113152 by Coyote
I think so.

But some people like to twist the rules. So an official answer would be good.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Moderators: AnkhaKraus
Time to create page: 0.105 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum